» Articles » PMID: 38420572

Tuberculosis Contact Tracing, Angola

Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcomes of a contact-tracing programme to increase the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Cubal, Angola and offer preventive treatment to high-risk groups.

Methods: A health centre-based contact-tracing programme was launched in Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz in March 2015 and we followed the programme until 2022. In that time, staffing and testing varied which we categorized as four periods: medical staff reinforcement, 2015-2017, with a doctor seconded from Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Spain; routine staff, 2017-2021, with no external medical support; community directly observed treatment (DOT), 2018-2019 with community worker support; and enhanced contact tracing, 2021-2022, with funding that allowed free chest radiographs, molecular and gastric aspirate testing. We assessed differences in contacts seen each month, and testing and treatment offered across the four periods.

Findings: Overall, the programme evaluated 1978 contacts from 969 index cases. Participation in the programme was low, although it increased significantly during the community DOT period. Only 16.6% (329/1978) of contacts had a chest radiograph. Microbiological confirmation increased to 72.2% (26/36) after including molecular testing, and 10.1% (200/1978) of contacts received treatment for tuberculosis. Of 457 contacts younger than 5 years, 36 (7.9%) received preventive tuberculosis treatment. Half of the contacts were lost to follow-up before a final decision was taken on treatment.

Conclusion: Contact tracing increased the diagnosis of tuberculosis although engagement with the programme was low and loss to follow-up was high. Participation increased during community DOT. Community-based screening should be explored to improve participation and diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Systematic Screening for Tuberculosis Using Molecular Testing on Stool Samples in Acutely Malnourished Children: A Pilot Implementation Study in a High-Burden Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Country.

Martinez-Camprecios J, Espinosa-Pereiro J, Nindia A, Cerezuela M, Sales M, Tchiloka E Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025; 12(3):ofaf086.

PMID: 40046881 PMC: 11879129. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf086.

References
1.
Hanrahan C, Nonyane B, Lebina L, Mmolawa L, Siwelana T, West N . Household- Versus Incentive-Based Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Rural South Africa: A Cluster-Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 76(7):1164-1172. PMC: 10319771. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac920. View

2.
Foster I, Sullivan A, Makanda G, Schoeman I, Tisile P, van der Westhuizen H . The role of counselling in tuberculosis diagnostic evaluation and contact tracing: scoping review and stakeholder consultation of knowledge and research gaps. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):190. PMC: 8795719. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12556-8. View

3.
Fox G, Nhung N, Sy D, Hoa N, Anh L, Anh N . Household-Contact Investigation for Detection of Tuberculosis in Vietnam. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(3):221-229. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700209. View

4.
Amare D, Getahun F, Mengesha E, Dessie G, Shiferaw M, Dires T . Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0271825. PMC: 10035837. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271825. View

5.
Tesfaye L, Lemu Y, Tareke K, Chaka M, Feyissa G . Exploration of barriers and facilitators to household contact tracing of index tuberculosis cases in Anlemo district, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: Qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(5):e0233358. PMC: 7244140. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233358. View