» Articles » PMID: 38415714

Continuity Strategies for Long-Stay PICU Patients: Consensus Statements From the Lucile Packard Foundation PICU Continuity Panel

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2024 Feb 28
PMID 38415714
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To develop consensus statements on continuity strategies using primary intensivists, primary nurses, and recurring multidisciplinary team meetings for long-stay patients (LSPs) in PICUs.

Participants: The multidisciplinary Lucile Packard Foundation PICU Continuity Panel comprising parents of children who had prolonged PICU stays and experts in several specialties/professions that care for children with medical complexity in and out of PICUs.

Design/methods: We used modified RAND Delphi methodology, with a comprehensive literature review, Delphi surveys, and a conference, to reach consensus. The literature review resulted in a synthesized bibliography, which was provided to panelists. We used an iterative process to generate draft statements following panelists' completion of four online surveys with open-ended questions on implementing and sustaining continuity strategies. Panelists were anonymous when they voted on revised draft statements. Agreement of 80% constituted consensus. At a 3-day virtual conference, we discussed, revised, and re-voted on statements not reaching or barely reaching consensus. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of the evidence and rate the statements' strength. The Panel also generated outcome, process, and balancing metrics to evaluate continuity strategies.

Results: The Panel endorsed 17 consensus statements in five focus areas of continuity strategies (Eligibility Criteria, Initiation, Standard Responsibilities, Resources Needed to Implement, Resources Needed to Sustain). The quality of evidence of the statements was low to very low, highlighting the limited evidence and the importance of panelists' experiences/expertise. The strength of the statements was conditional. An extensive list of potential evaluation metrics was generated.

Conclusions: These expert/parent-developed consensus statements provide PICUs with novel summaries on how to operationalize, implement, and sustain continuity strategies for LSP, a rapidly growing, vulnerable, resource-intensive population in PICUs.

Citing Articles

A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Multidisciplinary Teamwork in Chronic Critical Illness Patients.

Xu X, Jing M, Zhu Y, Jin H, Li L J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025; 18:827-836.

PMID: 39963329 PMC: 11831912. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S505022.

References
1.
Edwards J, Lucas A, Stone P, Boscardin W, Dudley R . Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of early unplanned readmissions to PICUs. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(12):2773-83. PMC: 4327890. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829eb970. View

2.
Salant J, Gangopadhyay M, Jia H, Wocial L, Edwards J . Distress and the Long-Stay Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Longitudinal Study of Parents and the Medical Team. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2023; 12(3):188-195. PMC: 10411061. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731429. View

3.
Ledger U, Reid J, Begley A, Dodek P, McAuley D, Prior L . Moral distress in end-of-life decisions: A qualitative study of intensive care physicians. J Crit Care. 2021; 62:185-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.019. View

4.
Donohue P, Williams E, Wright-Sexton L, Boss R . "It's Relentless": Providers' Experience of Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness. J Palliat Med. 2018; 21(7):940-946. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0397. View

5.
Dryden-Palmer K, Moore G, McNeil C, Larson C, Tomlinson G, Roumeliotis N . Moral Distress of Clinicians in Canadian Pediatric and Neonatal ICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019; 21(4):314-323. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002189. View