» Articles » PMID: 38415266

Comparisons of 3D Printed Materials for Biomedical Imaging Applications

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 28
PMID 38415266
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In biomedical imaging, it is desirable that custom-made accessories for restraint, anesthesia, and monitoring can be easily cleaned and not interfere with the imaging quality or analyses. With the rise of 3D printing as a form of rapid prototyping or manufacturing for imaging tools and accessories, it is important to understand which printable materials are durable and not likely to interfere with imaging applications. Here, 15 3D printable materials were evaluated for radiodensity, optical properties, simulated wear, and capacity for repeated cleaning and disinfection. Materials that were durable, easily cleaned, and not expected to interfere with CT, PET, or optical imaging applications were identified.

References
1.
Fullerton J, Frodsham G, Day R . 3D printing for the many, not the few. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(11):1086-7. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3056. View

2.
Hong C, Zhang S, Eltahawi A, Borazjani A, Kalami H, San A . Patient-Specific Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Three-Dimensional Printing: A Pilot Study. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023; 29(9):732-739. PMC: 10476593. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001346. View

3.
Crameri F, Shephard G, Heron P . The misuse of colour in science communication. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):5444. PMC: 7595127. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7. View

4.
Kiehl E, Stojadinovic S, Malinowski K, Limbrick D, Jost S, Garbow J . Feasibility of small animal cranial irradiation with the microRT system. Med Phys. 2008; 35(10):4735-43. PMC: 2736759. DOI: 10.1118/1.2977762. View

5.
Barbaresco F, Cocuzza M, Pirri C, Marasso S . Application of a Micro Free-Flow Electrophoresis 3D Printed Lab-on-a-Chip for Micro-Nanoparticles Analysis. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020; 10(7). PMC: 7408601. DOI: 10.3390/nano10071277. View