» Articles » PMID: 38415022

Is 1 Day of Focused Training in Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only (EASy) Examination Enough? A Tertiary Hospital Response to the COVID-19 Crisis and the Use of the EASy Examination to Support Unit-Wide Image Acquisition

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Feb 28
PMID 38415022
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the efficacy of 1-day training in echocardiography assessment using subxiphoid-only (EASy) followed by supervised image interpretation and decision-making during patient rounds as a novel approach to scaling up the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critically ill patients.

Design: Retrospective analysis of medical records and EASy examination images.

Setting: Tertiary care academic hospital.

Patients: A total of 14 adults (> 18 yr old) with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure under the care of Albany Medical Center's surge response team from April 6-17, 2020 who received at least one EASy examination.

Interventions: Residents (previously novice sonographers) were trained in EASy examination using 1 day of didactic and hands-on training, followed by independent image acquisition and supervised image interpretation, identification of hemodynamic patterns, and clinical decision-making facilitated by an echocardiography-certified physician during daily rounds.

Measurements And Main Results: We recorded the quality of resident-obtained EASy images, scanning time, and frequency with which the supervising physician had to repeat the examination or obtain additional images. A total of 63 EASy examinations were performed; average scanning time was 4.3 minutes. Resident-obtained images were sufficient for clinical decision-making on 55 occasions (87%), in the remaining 8 (13%) the supervising physician obtained further images.

Conclusions: EASy examination is an efficient, valuable tool under conditions of scarce resources. The educational model of 1-day training followed by supervised image interpretation and decision-making allows rapid expansion of the pool of sonographers and implementation of bedside echocardiography into routine ICU patient management.

Citing Articles

Mistaken Identity: Misidentification of Other Vascular Structures as the Inferior Vena Cava and How to Avoid It.

Zimmerman J, Morrissey C, Bughrara N, Bronshteyn Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410622 PMC: 11476350. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192218.

References
1.
George J, Doto F . A simple five-step method for teaching clinical skills. Fam Med. 2001; 33(8):577-8. View

2.
Labovitz A, Noble V, Bierig M, Goldstein S, Jones R, Kort S . Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010; 23(12):1225-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005. View

3.
Allyn J, Ferdynus C, Bohrer M, Dalban C, Valance D, Allou N . Simplified Acute Physiology Score II as Predictor of Mortality in Intensive Care Units: A Decision Curve Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164828. PMC: 5065161. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164828. View

4.
Jones A, Trzeciak S, Kline J . The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(5):1649-54. PMC: 2703722. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819def97. View

5.
Neskovic A, Hagendorff A, Lancellotti P, Guarracino F, Varga A, Cosyns B . Emergency echocardiography: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 14(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes193. View