» Articles » PMID: 38414712

Bioequivalence of a New Pediatric Paracetamol Oral Suspension Compared With a Marketed Formulation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Feb 28
PMID 38414712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A new oral paracetamol formulation with the same paracetamol quantity (24 mg/mL) as a marketed formulation but with finer active ingredient particle size and lower amounts of maltitol (5.85 g/dose in the test formulation vs 7.25 g/dose in the reference formulation) and sorbitol (2.4 g/dose vs 2.83 g/dose) was developed.

Objective: Establish the bioequivalence of the new pediatric formulation (test treatment) compared with the marketed formulation (reference treatment).

Methods: This Phase I, open-label trial assigned healthy adult volunteers to a single 42-mL (1 g para-cetamol) dose of test or reference treatment. Participants received both treatments in a randomized order separated by a 72-hour washout period. The primary endpoints were AUC (AUC vs time curve from time 0 to last measurable sampling timepoint), C, and t. Safety assessments included adverse event, clinical laboratory, and physical examination data.

Results: Thirty-five participants were randomized and treated. The study population was 42.9% women (57.1% men) with a median age of 30 years; most participants were non-Hispanic White. Mean C values were comparable between test and reference products, with a median t of 1.00 hour for both. The test/reference ratios (%) (90% CI) for AUC and C were 98.69% (96.46, 100.97) and 100.73% (95.63, 106.10), respectively. There were no adverse events or deaths.

Conclusions: The new paracetamol formulation is bioequivalent to the marketed formulation.

References
1.
Anderson B, Holford N, Woollard G, Chan P . Paracetamol plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 46(3):237-43. PMC: 1873683. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00780.x. View

2.
Flanagan T . Potential for pharmaceutical excipients to impact absorption: A mechanistic review for BCS Class 1 and 3 drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019; 141:130-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.05.020. View

3.
van Os S, Relleke M, Muniz Piniella P . Lack of bioequivalence between generic risperidone oral solution and originator risperidone tablets. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 45(5):293-9. DOI: 10.5414/cpp45293. View

4.
Anderson B, Woollard G, Holford N . A model for size and age changes in the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in neonates, infants and children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 50(2):125-34. PMC: 2014402. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00231.x. View

5.
Paul I, Walson P . Acetaminophen and ibuprofen in the treatment of pediatric fever: a narrative review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021; 37(8):1363-1375. DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1928617. View