The Clinical Utility of Repeating Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans Within 12 Months in the Management of Lumbosacral Degenerative Disc Disease

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 Feb 28

PMID 38414690

Authors

Muhammad Ashhad Noor

Mohammad Al-Ashqar

Ahmad Abul

James Grayston

Sohail Nisar

Peter R Loughenbury

Graham Radcliffe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard investigation for lumbosacral degenerative disc disease. However, there is controversy regarding the clinical value of repeating an MRI scan within 12 months when a patient presents with recurring or changing symptoms. This study measures rates of radiological change in a real-world cohort to guide clinicians when deciding to repeat a scan.

Methods: All patients over a 10-year window in one general hospital who underwent two lumbosacral MRI scans for degenerative disc disease within 12 months of each other were included in the study. All MRI reports were manually reviewed. The level of main vertebral pathology was recorded, along with the location of a disc prolapse. Time intervals between the two scans were calculated, and these were collated into 30-day intervals for analysis. The repeat scans were categorized into three groups: no change, radiological improvement, and radiological deterioration. Patients who had clinically significant deterioration in the form of cauda equina compression on MRI scans were recorded.

Findings: Four hundred and eighty-one patients were included for analysis. Three hundred and ninety (81%) showed no change in MRI findings, 18 (3.7%) had improvements in their repeat scans, and 73 (15.3%) demonstrated deterioration in their repeat scans. Of the 73 patients with radiological deterioration, three patients (0.62% of the total) required urgent surgical intervention for cauda equina syndrome (CES).

Conclusions: Though there is no alternative to detailed clinical assessment in determining whether a repeat MRI scan is indicated, the findings demonstrate that repeating MRI within 12 months for patients with lumbosacral degenerative disc disease has a low chance of altering the management plan. Over the 10-year period, only three patients required an urgent change to their clinical management. We believe this data can help guide clinical decision-making when considering a repeat scan.

References

Nguyen X, Tahir S, Bresnahan B, Andre J, Lang E, Mossa-Basha M . Prevalence and Financial Impact of Claustrophobia, Anxiety, Patient Motion, and Other Patient Events in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020; 29(3):125-130. DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000243. View

Hoeritzauer I, Wood M, Copley P, Demetriades A, Woodfield J . What is the incidence of cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 32(6):832-841. DOI: 10.3171/2019.12.SPINE19839. View

Darlow B, Forster B, OSullivan K, OSullivan P . It is time to stop causing harm with inappropriate imaging for low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 51(5):414-415. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096741. View

Broetz D, Hahn U, Maschke E, Wick W, Kueker W, Weller M . Lumbar disk prolapse: response to mechanical physiotherapy in the absence of changes in magnetic resonance imaging. Report of 11 cases. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008; 23(3):289-94. View

Wang Y, Dai G, Jiang L, Liao S . The incidence of regression after the non-surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):530. PMC: 7419225. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03548-z. View

Lee Y, Zotti M, Osti O . Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(4):801-19. PMC: 4995268. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.801. View

Tawa N, Rhoda A, Diener I . Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting lumbo-sacral nerve root compromise: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17(1):386. PMC: 5012065. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1236-z. View

Santilli V, Beghi E, Finucci S . Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations. Spine J. 2006; 6(2):131-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.001. View

Taher F, Essig D, Lebl D, Hughes A, Sama A, Cammisa F . Lumbar degenerative disc disease: current and future concepts of diagnosis and management. Adv Orthop. 2012; 2012:970752. PMC: 3335178. DOI: 10.1155/2012/970752. View

10.

Lavy C, James A, Wilson-MacDonald J, Fairbank J . Cauda equina syndrome. BMJ. 2009; 338:b936. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b936. View

11.

Brooks M, Dower A, Abdul Jalil M, Kohan S . Radiological predictors of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 34(3):481-491. DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20598. View

12.

Choi Y . Pathophysiology of degenerative disc disease. Asian Spine J. 2010; 3(1):39-44. PMC: 2852042. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2009.3.1.39. View

13.

El Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Lycklama A Nijeholt G, Van der Kallen B, van den Hout W, Jacobs W . Magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up assessment of sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(11):999-1007. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209250. View

14.

Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, Franklin T, van den Haak E, Hurwitz E . Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings?. Spine J. 2006; 6(6):624-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.005. View

15.

Flynn T, Smith B, Chou R . Appropriate use of diagnostic imaging in low back pain: a reminder that unnecessary imaging may do as much harm as good. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41(11):838-46. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3618. View

16.

Fairbank J, Hashimoto R, Dailey A, Patel A, Dettori J . Does patient history and physical examination predict MRI proven cauda equina syndrome?. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012; 2(4):27-33. PMC: 3506147. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1274754. View

17.

Chiu C, Chuang T, Chang K, Wu C, Lin P, Hsu W . The probability of spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 29(2):184-95. DOI: 10.1177/0269215514540919. View

18.

Sloan T, Walsh D . Explanatory and diagnostic labels and perceived prognosis in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):E1120-5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e089a9. View