Evaluating the Impact of a Blended Interprofessional Education Course on Students' Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Education: a Pre-post Study

Overview

Journal BMC Med Educ

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2024 Feb 27

PMID 38413938

Authors

M Guinat

L Staffoni

V Santschi

A Didier

D Gachoud

C Greppin-Becherraz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Since 2011, five educational and healthcare institutions have implemented a short interprofessional education (IPE) course to bring together undergraduates from five disciplines. To meet the logistical challenges of IPE implementation, more specifically, the large number of classrooms needed to gather students together and the need for human resources to guide learning activities, a face-to-face IPE course was redesigned into a blended (online and face-to-face collaborative learning activities) IPE course. In March 2023, 183 medical, 378 nursing, 46 radiologic technology, 69 physiotherapy, and 74 occupational therapy students participated in a one-day IPE blended course to learn interprofessional team functioning and dynamics, role clarification and responsibilities of other professions, and interprofessional communication skills. This study aimed to assess students' changes in attitudes towards IPE after being involved in a large-scale interprofessional blended learning course.

Methods: A before-after study was conducted using a French translation of the validated questionnaire "University of West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire" (UWE-IP questionnaire). Students' attitudes towards interprofessional (IP) relationships and IP learning were measured before and after the course. In March 2023, two hundred fifty-six students from five professions answered two subscales of the UWE-IP questionnaire before and after the course (response rate 34%).

Results: Students' attitudes towards IP relationships improved significantly after the course. The score on this subscale (min 8; max 24) changed from 11.18 (SD 2,67) before the course to 10,38 (SD 2,55) after the course, indicating a significant improvement in attitudes towards IP relationships (p < 0,001). More specifically, students had more positive attitudes on the item "I have a good understanding of the roles of different health and social care professionals." and the item "I feel that I am respected by people from other health and social care disciplines." after the course. A positive change in students' attitudes towards IP learning was observed, but the results were not significative.

Conclusion: A face-to-face IPE course redesigned as a blended course helped overcome existing challenges to implementing an IPE course. The results suggest a blended IPE course improves students' attitudes towards interprofessionality.

References

Khalili H, Orchard C . The effects of an IPS-based IPE program on interprofessional socialization and dual identity development. J Interprof Care. 2020; :1-11. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1709427. View

Vanier M, Therriault P, Lebel P, Nolin F, Lefebvre H, Brault I . Innovating in teaching collaborative practice with a large student cohort at Université de Montréal. J Allied Health. 2013; 42(4):e97-e106. View

Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H . A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Med Teach. 2008; 29(8):735-51. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701682576. View

West C, Graham L, Palmer R, Miller M, Thayer E, Stuber M . Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools: Common practices, barriers and facilitators. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2017; 4:41-49. PMC: 5295473. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjep.2016.05.002. View

Pollard K, Miers M, Gilchrist M . Second year scepticism: pre-qualifying health and social care students' midpoint self-assessment, attitudes and perceptions concerning interprofessional learning and working. J Interprof Care. 2005; 19(3):251-68. DOI: 10.1080/13561820400024225. View

Lestari E, Rahmawatie D, Wulandari C . Does Online Interprofessional Case-Based Learning Facilitate Collaborative Knowledge Construction?. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:85-99. PMC: 9842520. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S391997. View

Lawlis T, Anson J, Greenfield D . Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable interprofessional education: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 2014; 28(4):305-10. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2014.895977. View

Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Gilligan C . A cross-sectional survey examining the extent to which interprofessional education is used to teach nursing, pharmacy and medical students in Australian and New Zealand universities. J Interprof Care. 2012; 26(5):390-6. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2012.690009. View

Pollard K, Miers M, Gilchrist M . Collaborative learning for collaborative working? Initial findings from a longitudinal study of health and social care students. Health Soc Care Community. 2004; 12(4):346-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00504.x. View

10.

Pollard K, Miers M, Gilchrist M, Sayers A . A comparison of interprofessional perceptions and working relationships among health and social care students: the results of a 3-year intervention. Health Soc Care Community. 2006; 14(6):541-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00642.x. View

11.

Ho K, Jarvis-Selinger S, Borduas F, Frank B, Hall P, Handfield-Jones R . Making interprofessional education work: the strategic roles of the academy. Acad Med. 2008; 83(10):934-40. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850a75. View

12.

Hew K, Lo C . Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):38. PMC: 5855972. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z. View

13.

van Diggele C, Roberts C, Burgess A, Mellis C . Interprofessional education: tips for design and implementation. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(Suppl 2):455. PMC: 7712597. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02286-z. View

14.

Artino Jr A, Youmans Q, Tuck M . Getting the Most Out of Surveys: Optimizing Respondent Motivation. J Grad Med Educ. 2023; 14(6):629-633. PMC: 9765912. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00722.1. View

15.

Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T . Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010; 376(9756):1923-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. View

16.

Curran V, Reid A, Reis P, Doucet S, Price S, Alcock L . The use of information and communications technologies in the delivery of interprofessional education: A review of evaluation outcome levels. J Interprof Care. 2015; 29(6):541-50. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1021002. View

17.

Raynault A, Lebel P, Brault I, Vanier M, Flora L . How interprofessional teams of students mobilized collaborative practice competencies and the patient partnership approach in a hybrid IPE course. J Interprof Care. 2020; 35(4):574-585. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1783217. View

18.

Riesen E, Morley M, Clendinneng D, Ogilvie S, Murray M . Improving interprofessional competence in undergraduate students using a novel blended learning approach. J Interprof Care. 2012; 26(4):312-8. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2012.660286. View

19.

Chen F, Lui A, Martinelli S . A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ. 2017; 51(6):585-597. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13272. View

20.

Jones T, Vidal G, Taylor C . Interprofessional education during the COVID-19 pandemic: finding the good in a bad situation. J Interprof Care. 2020; 34(5):633-646. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1801614. View