» Articles » PMID: 38410341

Urinary Incontinence Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Literature Review

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Feb 27
PMID 38410341
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer ranks as one of the most prevalent cancers among men in the United States, contributing significantly to cancer-related mortality. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a cornerstone in the management of localized prostate cancer. This literature review delves into the outcomes of RARP, specifically its impact on urinary incontinence (UI) compared to other surgical methods. We also present the importance of patient perception versus medical reports. Recent studies and trials have unveiled that postoperative UI and erectile dysfunction (ED) remain common concerns following prostatectomy. However, studies have shown that RARP has lower occurrences of UI and ED compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). While the choice of surgical method may not drastically affect these outcomes, the review emphasizes that urinary incontinence extends beyond physical symptoms. It profoundly impacts patients' psychological well-being, social interactions, and overall quality of life. Differences in symptom recording and interpretation between patients and healthcare professionals can significantly influence the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Enhanced patient-physician communication and patient-centered care are essential to providing a holistic approach to prostate cancer management. The choice of surgical methods may not significantly impact postoperative urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Continued research and advancements in treatment and patient care are crucial for improving outcomes and the overall well-being of prostate cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Initial Experience with an Absorbable Urologic Scaffold to Mitigate Early Urinary Incontinence following Radical Prostatectomy: A Report of 2 Cases.

Ferrandino M, Espino G, Young M, Bodden E, Gahan J Urol Int. 2024; 108(6):574-577.

PMID: 39102800 PMC: 11614306. DOI: 10.1159/000540739.

References
1.
Carson C . Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl. 2020; 22(2):154-157. PMC: 7155799. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_20. View

2.
Tricard T, Song Q, Munier P, Li J, Leng J, Saussine C . Adjustable continence therapy (proACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence post-prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023 update). World J Urol. 2023; 41(7):1793-1802. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04452-6. View

3.
Mallah F, Montazeri A, Ghanbari Z, Tavoli A, Haghollahi F, Aziminekoo E . Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life among Iranian Women. J Family Reprod Health. 2014; 8(1):13-9. PMC: 4064760. View

4.
Scott F, BRADLEY W, Timm G . Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology. 1973; 1(3):252-9. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90749-8. View

5.
Reynolds B, Bulsara C, Zeps N, Codde J, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D . Exploring pathways towards improving patient experience of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): assessing patient satisfaction and attitudes. BJU Int. 2018; 121 Suppl 3:33-39. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14226. View