» Articles » PMID: 38409546

Comprehensive Assessment of TECENTRIQ® and OPDIVO®: Analyzing Immunotherapy Indications Withdrawn in Triple-negative Breast Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Feb 27
PMID 38409546
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ®) and nivolumab (OPDIVO®) are both immunotherapeutic indications targeting programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), respectively. These inhibitors hold promise as therapies for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and have demonstrated encouraging results in reducing the progression and spread of tumors. However, due to their adverse effects and low response rates, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has withdrawn the approval of atezolizumab in TNBC and nivolumab in HCC treatment. The withdrawals of atezolizumab and nivolumab have raised concerns regarding their effectiveness and the ability to predict treatment responses. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate the immunotherapy withdrawal of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, specifically atezolizumab for TNBC and nivolumab for HCC. This study will examine both the structural and clinical aspects. This review provides detailed insights into the structure of the PD-1 receptor and its ligands, the interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1, and their interactions with the withdrawn antibodies (atezolizumab and nivolumab) as well as PD-1 and PD-L1 modifications. In addition, this review further assesses these antibodies in the context of TNBC and HCC. It seeks to elucidate the factors that contribute to diverse responses to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in different types of cancer and propose approaches for predicting responses, mitigating the potential risks linked to therapy withdrawals, and optimizing patient outcomes. By better understanding the mechanisms underlying responses to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and developing strategies to predict these responses, it is possible to create more efficient treatments for TNBC and HCC.

Citing Articles

Editorial: Glycobiology and glycosylation: deciphering the secrets of glycans in humans and pathogens.

Jabbarzadeh Kaboli P, Proestos C Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1560135.

PMID: 39963135 PMC: 11830719. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560135.


Potential therapies for non-coding RNAs in breast cancer.

Li R, Ji Y, Ye R, Tang G, Wang W, Chen C Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1452666.

PMID: 39372872 PMC: 11449682. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1452666.

References
1.
Sangro B, Chan S, Meyer T, Reig M, El-Khoueiry A, Galle P . Diagnosis and management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020; 72(2):320-341. PMC: 7779342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.021. View

2.
Alsaab H, Sau S, Alzhrani R, Tatiparti K, Bhise K, Kashaw S . PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome. Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8:561. PMC: 5572324. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00561. View

3.
Okusaka T, Ikeda M . Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. ESMO Open. 2019; 3(Suppl 1):e000455. PMC: 6307608. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000455. View

4.
Jabbarzadeh Kaboli P, Shabani S, Sharma S, Nasr M, Yamaguchi H, Hung M . Shedding light on triple-negative breast cancer with Trop2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates. Am J Cancer Res. 2022; 12(4):1671-1685. PMC: 9077081. View

5.
Huang Q, Zheng Y, Gao Z, Yuan L, Sun Y, Chen H . Comparative Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Patients with Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. J Cancer. 2021; 12(4):1133-1143. PMC: 7797652. DOI: 10.7150/jca.49325. View