» Articles » PMID: 38407613

Assessment of Malalignment at Early Stage in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Longitudinal Cohort Study

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to assess abnormalities of the odontoid-hip axis (OD-HA) angle in a mild scoliotic population to determine whether screening for malalignment would help predict the distinction between progressive and stable adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at early stage.

Materials And Methods: All patients (non-scoliotic and AIS) underwent a biplanar X-ray between 2013 and 2020. In AIS, inclusion criteria were Cobb angle between 10° and 25°; Risser sign lower than 3; age higher than 10 years; and no previous treatment. A 3D spine reconstruction was performed, and the OD-HA was computed automatically. A reference corridor for OD-HA values in non-scoliotic subjects was calculated as the range [5th-95th percentiles]. A severity index, helping to distinguish stable and progressive AIS, was calculated and weighted according to the OD-HA value.

Results: Eighty-three non-scoliotic and 205 AIS were included. The mean coronal and sagittal OD-HA angles in the non-scoliotic group were 0.2° and -2.5°, whereas in AIS values were 0.3° and -0.8°, respectively. For coronal and sagittal OD-HA, 27.5% and 26.8% of AIS were outside the reference corridor compared with 10.8% in non-scoliotic (OR = 3.1 and 3). Adding to the severity index a weighting factor based on coronal OD-HA, for thoracic scoliosis, improved the positive predictive value by 9% and the specificity by 13%.

Conclusion: Analysis of OD-HA suggests that AIS patients are almost three times more likely to have malalignment compared with a non-scoliotic population. Furthermore, analysis of coronal OD-HA is promising to help the clinician distinguish between stable and progressive thoracic scoliosis.

Citing Articles

Coronal alignment in normal individuals and moderate scoliosis: Normative values, variation with age and comparison with sagittal alignment.

Gharbi A, Obeid I, Larrieu D, Boissiere L, Huneidi M, Lamotte-Paulet P Brain Spine. 2025; 4():103917.

PMID: 39823062 PMC: 11736157. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103917.


3D external shape analysis and barycentremetry can provide early signs of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Langlais T, Vergari C, Mainard N, du Cluzel X, Baudoux M, Gajny L Spine Deform. 2024; 13(2):551-560.

PMID: 39495403 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-01001-y.


Scoliosis and Lower Limb Inequality: To Lift or Not to Lift, That Is the Question.

Colonna S, Casacci F, Borghi C Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58443.

PMID: 38633141 PMC: 11022167. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58443.

References
1.
COONRAD R, Murrell G, Motley G, Lytle E, Hey L . A logical coronal pattern classification of 2,000 consecutive idiopathic scoliosis cases based on the scoliosis research society-defined apical vertebra. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(12):1380-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199806150-00016. View

2.
Kouwenhoven J, Castelein R . The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(26):2898-908. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751. View

3.
Assaiante C, Mallau S, Jouve J, Bollini G, Vaugoyeau M . Do adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) neglect proprioceptive information in sensory integration of postural control?. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e40646. PMC: 3398941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040646. View

4.
Guo X, Chau W, Hui-Chan C, Cheung C, Tsang W, Cheng J . Balance control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and disturbed somatosensory function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(14):E437-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222048.47010.bf. View

5.
Skalli W, Vergari C, Ebermeyer E, Courtois I, Drevelle X, Kohler R . Early Detection of Progressive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Severity Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 42(11):823-830. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001961. View