» Articles » PMID: 38406869

Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock continues to portend poor outcomes, conferring short-term mortality rates of 30% to 50% despite recent scientific advances. Age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and is often considered in the decision-making process for eligibility for various therapies. Older adults have been largely excluded from analyses of therapeutic options in patients with cardiogenic shock. As a result, despite the association of advanced age with worse outcomes, focused strategies in the assessment and management of cardiogenic shock in this high-risk and growing population are lacking. Individual programs oftentimes develop upper age limits for various interventional strategies for their patients, including heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices. However, age as a lone parameter should not be used to guide individual patient management decisions in cardiogenic shock. In the assessment of risk in older adults with cardiogenic shock, a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach is central to developing best practices. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we aim to summarize our contemporary understanding of the epidemiology, risk assessment, and in-hospital approach to management of cardiogenic shock, with a unique focus on older adults.

Citing Articles

Predictors and Impact of Cardiogenic Shock in Oldest-Old ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Donazzan L, Ruzzarin A, Muraglia S, Fabris E, Verdoia M, Zilio F J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2.

PMID: 39860511 PMC: 11766001. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020504.


Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Older People: Comprehensive Review and Multidisciplinary Practice-Based Recommendations.

Narendren A, Whitehead N, Burrell L, Yudi M, Yeoh J, Jones N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124683 PMC: 11312870. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154416.


A Delicate Matter: The Burden of Frailty on AMI-CS.

Gutierrez J, Narcisse D, Menachem J JACC Adv. 2024; 3(6):100947.

PMID: 38938871 PMC: 11198371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100947.

References
1.
Cooper L, Lu D, Mentz R, Rogers J, Milano C, Felker G . Cardiac transplantation for older patients: Characteristics and outcomes in the septuagenarian population. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 35(3):362-369. PMC: 4789155. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.028. View

2.
Prasad A, Lennon R, Rihal C, Berger P, Holmes Jr D . Outcomes of elderly patients with cardiogenic shock treated with early percutaneous revascularization. Am Heart J. 2004; 147(6):1066-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.030. View

3.
Daneshvar D, Czer L, Phan A, Schwarz E, De Robertis M, Mirocha J . Heart transplantation in patients aged 70 years and older: a two-decade experience. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43(10):3851-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.086. View

4.
Jentzer J, Burstein B, van Diepen S, Murphy J, Holmes Jr D, Bell M . Defining Shock and Preshock for Mortality Risk Stratification in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. Circ Heart Fail. 2021; 14(1):e007678. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007678. View

5.
Lawton J, Tamis-Holland J, Bangalore S, Bates E, Beckie T, Bischoff J . 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 145(3):e18-e114. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. View