» Articles » PMID: 38406575

A Meta-analysis of Alveolar Bone Grafting Using Bone Substitutes in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Overview
Journal Tzu Chi Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 26
PMID 38406575
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trial (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6-12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6-12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed-effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval - 0.301-0.730; = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews.

References
1.
Pallesen L, Schou S, Aaboe M, Hjorting-Hansen E, Nattestad A, Melsen F . Influence of particle size of autogenous bone grafts on the early stages of bone regeneration: a histologic and stereologic study in rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17(4):498-506. View

2.
Mossaad A, Badry T, Abdelrahaman M, Abdelazim A, Ghanem W, Hassan S . Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(8):1369-1373. PMC: 6514340. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.236. View

3.
Canan Jr L, Freitas R, Alonso N, Tanikawa D, Rocha D, Coelho J . Human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use for maxillary reconstruction in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23(6):1627-33. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825c75ba. View

4.
Bezerra B, Pinho J, Figueiredo F, Brandao J, Ayres L, Ferreira da Silva L . Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Bovine Bone Graft in Association With Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Clefts: A Pilot Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 56(1):134-140. DOI: 10.1177/1055665618770194. View

5.
Kumar V, Rattan V, Rai S, Singh S, Mahajan J . Comparative Assessment of Autogenous Cancellous Bone Graft and Bovine-Derived Demineralized Bone Matrix for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021; 59(7):833-840. DOI: 10.1177/10556656211025197. View