» Articles » PMID: 38402734

Potential of Molecular Classification to Guide Fertility-sparing Management Among Young Patients with Endometrial Cancer

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2024 Feb 25
PMID 38402734
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The traditional histological classification system for endometrial carcinoma falls short in addressing the disease's molecular heterogeneity, prompting the need for alternative stratification methods. Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) has emerged as a clinically efficient tool to categorize endometrial cancers according to mismatch repair deficiency, POLE exonuclease domain mutations, and p53 expression. However, the application of this classification to fertility-sparing treatments remains unexplored, and current guidelines lack specificity in how it should be used. In this review, we summarize the available literature and establish the framework for future investigations focused on molecular profiling-based risk assessment of endometrial cancer, with the goal of utilizing precision medicine to optimally counsel patients seeking fertility-sparing treatment. While the available evidence is limited and of low quality, it does provide insights and frames future perspectives for managing fertility-sparing approaches on the basis of molecular subtypes. Evidence suggests that mismatch repair-deficient tumors are likely to recur despite progestin therapy, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments, with targeted therapies being a new landscape that still needs to be explored. Tumors with POLE mutations exhibit a favorable prognosis, but the safety of hysteroscopic resection alone requires further investigation. p53 abnormal tumors have an unfavorable prognosis, raising questions about their suitability for fertility-sparing treatment. Lastly, the no specific molecular profile (or p53 wild-type) tumors, while having a relatively good prognosis, are heterogeneous and require more precise biomarkers to effectively guide therapy for those with poorer prognoses. Addressing these research gaps will lead to more precise guidelines to ensure optimal selection for fertility-sparing treatment.

Citing Articles

Preclinical research models for endometrial cancer: development and selection of animal models.

Xue Y, Shi W, Lun B, Kan M, Jia M, Wu Y Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1512616.

PMID: 39975595 PMC: 11835666. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1512616.


Unsolved Issues in the Integrated Histo-Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma and Therapeutic Implications.

Kuhn E, Gambini D, Runza L, Ferrero S, Scarfone G, Bulfamante G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001520 PMC: 11240465. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132458.

References
1.
Falcone F, Normanno N, Losito N, Scognamiglio G, Esposito Abate R, Chicchinelli N . Application of the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) to patients conservatively treated: Outcomes from an institutional series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 240:220-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.013. View

2.
Jumaah A, Salim M, Al-Haddad H, McAllister K, Yasseen A . The frequency of POLE-mutation in endometrial carcinoma and prognostic implications: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020; 54(6):471-479. PMC: 7674757. DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2020.07.23. View

3.
Berek J, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S . FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023; 162(2):383-394. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14923. View

4.
Giampaolino P, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Mollo A, Raffone A, Travaglino A, Boccellino A . Hysteroscopic Endometrial Focal Resection followed by Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Insertion as a Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 26(4):648-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.001. View

5.
Berg H, Engerud H, Myrvold M, Lien H, Hjelmeland M, Halle M . Mismatch repair markers in preoperative and operative endometrial cancer samples; expression concordance and prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2022; 128(4):647-655. PMC: 9938259. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02063-3. View