» Articles » PMID: 38402496

Lupus Low Disease Activity State and Organ Damage in Relation to Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Cohort Study with Up to 11 Years of Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2024 Feb 25
PMID 38402496
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Beyond prevention of organ damage, treatment goals in SLE include optimization of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) has received increasing attention as a goal whenever remission cannot be achieved. How SLE disease activity, organ damage and LLDAS attainment relate to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is not fully explored, which formed the scope of this investigation.

Methods: We included 327 patients with SLE from a tertiary referral centre. Longitudinal registrations of disease activity using SLEDAI-2K and physician global assessment (PhGA), organ damage using the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI), pharmacotherapies, EQ-5D-3L data, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for fatigue, pain and overall SLE-related health state over a median follow-up time of 8.5 years were analysed.

Results: In the overall population, as well as subgroups of patients with recent-onset SLE and those with clinically active, autoantibody-positive disease, LLDAS attainment, lower PhGA and lower clinical SLEDAI-2K scores were associated with favourable HRQoL by EQ-5D-3L and VAS assessments, while increasing SDI scores were associated with poor PROs except for fatigue in the overall population. PROs were further enhanced by being in LLDAS sustainedly. In fully adjusted models of the entire study population, LLDAS attainment and lower disease activity were associated with favourable PROs, irrespective of SDI.

Conclusion: In one of the longest observational studies to date, we demonstrated that low disease activity and being sustainedly in LLDAS were coupled with favourable HRQoL, pain, fatigue and overall health experience, irrespective of organ damage.

Citing Articles

Holistic approaches in systemic lupus erythematosus: do physicians avoid addressing difficult-to-treat but highly relevant symptoms?.

Parodis I, Wincup C, Touma Z, Andersen J, Strand V, Sjowall C RMD Open. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 40055003 PMC: 11891533. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005400.


Development and evaluation of a Register-Based Organ Damage Index in systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide, population-based study from Sweden.

Gomez A, Parodis I, Saleh M, Simard J, Sjowall C, Arkema E Lupus Sci Med. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 40011068 PMC: 11865802. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001403.


The Association of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies with Patient-reported Outcomes of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Two-consecutive Year Prospective Study.

Nakakubo Y, Tsuji H, Takase Y, Yoshida T, Kozuki T, Iwasaki T Kobe J Med Sci. 2025; 70(4):E113-E124.

PMID: 39993784 PMC: 11896095. DOI: 10.24546/0100492949.


Impact of quality of life on overall work productivity impairment and activity impairment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the PEONY study.

Tanaka Y, Miyazaki Y, Hirata S, Kusaka K, Kosaka S, Nakatsuka K Lupus Sci Med. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39832910 PMC: 11751967. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001291.


The NYMERIA Study: A Real-World, Multicentre Contemporary Assessment of Disease- and Patient-Related Burden and Treatment Strategies in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Bertsias G, Fanouriakis A, Bartsakoulia M, Galanakis P, Boumpas D Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2024; 35(Suppl 2):392-401.

PMID: 39193181 PMC: 11345607. DOI: 10.31138/mjr.160524.tns.

References
1.
Elefante E, Tani C, Stagnaro C, Signorini V, Parma A, Carli L . Articular involvement, steroid treatment and fibromyalgia are the main determinants of patient-physician discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020; 22(1):241. PMC: 7559765. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02334-5. View

2.
Smolen J, Strand V, Cardiel M, Edworthy S, Furst D, Gladman D . Randomized clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: consensus on a preliminary core set of outcome domains. J Rheumatol. 1999; 26(2):504-7. View

3.
Golder V, Ooi J, Antony A, Ko T, Morton S, Kandane-Rathnayake R . Discordance of patient and physician health status concerns in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2017; 27(3):501-506. DOI: 10.1177/0961203317722412. View

4.
Lati C, Guthrie L, Ward M . Comparison of the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the visual analog scale and a modified rating scale as measures of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010; 37(4):717-22. PMC: 2959173. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090764. View

5.
McElhone K, Abbott J, Gray J, Williams A, Teh L . Patient perspective of systemic lupus erythematosus in relation to health-related quality of life concepts: a qualitative study. Lupus. 2010; 19(14):1640-7. DOI: 10.1177/0961203310378668. View