» Articles » PMID: 38402259

Beam Quality and the Mystery Behind the Lower Percentage Depth Dose in Grid Radiation Therapy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Feb 24
PMID 38402259
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grid therapy recently has been picking momentum due to favorable outcomes in bulky tumors. This is being termed as Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) and lattice therapy. SFRT can be performed with specially designed blocks made with brass or cerrobend with repeated holes or using multi-leaf collimators where dosimetry is uncertain. The dosimetric challenge in grid therapy is the mystery behind the lower percentage depth dose (PDD) in grid fields. The knowledge about the beam quality, indexed by TPR (Tissue Phantom Ratio), is also necessary for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. Since the grid may change the quality of the primary photons, a new [Formula: see text] should be evaluated for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. A Monte Carlo (MC) approach is provided to resolving the dosimetric issues. Using 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator, MC simulation was performed using MCNPX code. Additionally, a commercial grid therapy device was used to simulate the grid fields. Beam parameters were validated with MC model for output factor, depth of maximum dose, PDDs, dose profiles, and TPR The electron and photon spectra were also compared between open and grid fields. The d is the same for open and grid fields. The PDD with grid is lower (~ 10%) than the open field. The difference in TPR of open and grid fields is observable (~ 5%). Accordingly, TPR is still a good index for the beam quality in grid fields and consequently choose the correct [Formula: see text] in measurements. The output factors for grid fields are 0.2 lower compared to open fields. The lower depth dose with grid therapy is due to lower depth fluence with scatter radiation but it does not impact the dosimetry as the calibration parameters are insensitive to the effective beam energies. Thus, standard dosimetry in open beam based on international protocol could be used.

Citing Articles

Grid/lattice therapy: consideration of small field dosimetry.

Das I, Khan A, Dogan S, Longo M Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1158):1088-1098.

PMID: 38552328 PMC: 11135801. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae060.

References
1.
Pokhrel D, Halfman M, Sanford L, Chen Q, Kudrimoti M . A novel, yet simple MLC-based 3D-crossfire technique for spatially fractionated GRID therapy treatment of deep-seated bulky tumors. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(3):68-74. PMC: 7075376. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12826. View

2.
Marks H . Clinical experience with irradiation through a grid. Radiology. 1952; 58(3):338-42. DOI: 10.1148/58.3.338. View

3.
Mohiuddin M, Curtis D, Grizos W, Komarnicky L . Palliative treatment of advanced cancer using multiple nonconfluent pencil beam radiation. A pilot study. Cancer. 1990; 66(1):114-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<114::aid-cncr2820660121>3.0.co;2-l. View

4.
Karimi A, Vega-Carrillo H . Grid therapy vs. conventional radiotherapy - 18 MV treatments: Photoneutron contamination along the maze of a linac bunker. Appl Radiat Isot. 2020; 158:109064. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109064. View

5.
Mayr N, Snider J, Regine W, Mohiuddin M, Hippe D, Penagaricano J . An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7(2):100866. PMC: 8843999. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100866. View