Experiences of Clients and Professionals with the Recovery Oriented Intake

Overview

Journal Community Ment Health J

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Feb 24

PMID 38401011

Authors

Fabiana Engelsbel

Nanette Waterhout

Marty Dijkstra

Rene Keet

Annet Nugter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Recovery Oriented Intake (ROI) integrates recovery principles from the start of treatment, and involves peer experts, unlike the intake as usual (IAU). This study compared experiences with ROI and IAU among 127 clients and 391 professionals, consisting of practitioners and peer experts. Intake's quality, measured with questionnaires, showed no differences in experiences between ROI and IAU clients. However, practitioners experienced ROI as more recovery-oriented than IAU. The ROI Fidelity Check (RFC) revealed that clients' RFC-scores, but not practitioners', predicted their valuation of intake's quality. This underscores the need for (re)training and peer supervision for professionals to ensure adherence to ROI's principles. Discrepancies between clients' and professionals' experiences at the start of treatment are consistent with literature on working alliance and Shared Decision Making (SDM). Differences between ROI and IAU professionals may stem from heightened awareness of recovery principles due to training and the presence of peer experts during intake.

References

Koksma J, Kremer J . Beyond the Quality Illusion: The Learning Era. Acad Med. 2018; 94(2):166-169. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002464. View

Huber M, Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad A, Kromhout D . How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. View

van Benthem P, Spijkerman R, Blanken P, Kleinjan M, Vermeiren R, Hendriks V . A dual perspective on first-session therapeutic alliance: strong predictor of youth mental health and addiction treatment outcome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020; 29(11):1593-1601. PMC: 7595997. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01503-w. View

Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M . Putting recovery into mental health practice. Ment Health Today. 2008; :28-31. View

Jennissen S, Nikendei C, Ehrenthal J, Schauenburg H, Dinger U . Influence of patient and therapist agreement and disagreement about their alliance on symptom severity over the course of treatment: A response surface analysis. J Couns Psychol. 2019; 67(3):326-336. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000398. View

Repper J, Carter T . A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011; 20(4):392-411. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2011.583947. View

Thomas E, Despeaux K, Drapalski A, Bennett M . Person-Oriented Recovery of Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Findings. Psychiatr Serv. 2017; 69(3):259-267. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700058. View

Jeste D, Palmer B, Rettew D, Boardman S . Positive psychiatry: its time has come. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015; 76(6):675-83. PMC: 5748141. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14nr09599. View

Deegan P . The lived experience of using psychiatric medication in the recovery process and a shared decision-making program to support it. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007; 31(1):62-9. DOI: 10.2975/31.1.2007.62.69. View

10.

Loh A, Simon D, Wills C, Kriston L, Niebling W, Harter M . The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 67(3):324-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. View

11.

Drivenes K, Haaland V, Hauge Y, Vederhus J, Irgens A, Solli K . Discrepancy in Ratings of Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Health Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study in Mental Health Care. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:443. PMC: 7108784. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00443. View

12.

Drake R, Deegan P, Rapp C . The promise of shared decision making in mental health. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010; 34(1):7-13. DOI: 10.2975/34.1.2010.7.13. View

13.

Slade M, Williams J, Bird V, Leamy M, Boutillier C . Recovery grows up. J Ment Health. 2012; 21(2):99-103. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2012.670888. View

14.

Keet R, de Vetten-Mc Mahon M, Shields-Zeeman L, Ruud T, van Weeghel J, Bahler M . Recovery for all in the community; position paper on principles and key elements of community-based mental health care. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19(1):174. PMC: 6558752. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2162-z. View

15.

Slade M, Amering M, Farkas M, Hamilton B, OHagan M, Panther G . Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13(1):12-20. PMC: 3918008. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20084. View

16.

Farkas M, Boevink W . Peer delivered services in mental health care in 2018: infancy or adolescence?. World Psychiatry. 2018; 17(2):222-224. PMC: 5980530. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20530. View

17.

Rake E, Box I, Dreesens D, Meinders M, Kremer J, Aarts J . Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2022; 105(9):2860-2870. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009. View

18.

Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P . Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27(10):1361-7. PMC: 3445676. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. View

19.

Carrotte E, Hartup M, Lee-Bates B, Blanchard M . "I think that everybody should be involved": What informs experiences of shared decision-making in supporting people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders?. Patient Educ Couns. 2020; 104(7):1583-1590. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.012. View

20.

van Weeghel J, van Zelst C, Boertien D, Hasson-Ohayon I . Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019; 42(2):169-181. DOI: 10.1037/prj0000356. View