» Articles » PMID: 38398410

Predictors of Revascularization in Patients with Unstable Angina

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 24
PMID 38398410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The factors that determine the necessity of coronary artery revascularization in patients with unstable angina (UA) have been supported by limited data. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictors of revascularization in patients with UA.

Methods: The study included the recorded data of 3668 patients with UA who underwent cardiac catheterization (age 66 ± 9.2, men 70%); 2615 of them (71%) underwent revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or hybrid revascularization. The remaining 1053 patients (29%) had no significant coronary stenosis and were regarded as controls. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to separate the predictors of revascularization.

Results: It was found that severe angina (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.9-3.7), male gender (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7), and hyperlipidemia were the predictors of revascularization. It was also noted that intraventricular conduction disorders including left and right bundle branch blocks and a history of previous revascularization and myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of revascularization.

Conclusion: Overall, however, the predictive value of the studied factors proved to be poor and may still point to the multifactorial nature of significant coronary artery stenosis and the need for revascularization in patients with UA.

References
1.
Gul M, Uyarel H, Ergelen M, Karacimen D, Ugur M, Turer A . The relationship between red blood cell distribution width and the clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris: a 3-year follow-up. Coron Artery Dis. 2012; 23(5):330-6. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564986. View

2.
Shah A, Anand A, Strachan F, Ferry A, Lee K, Chapman A . High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 392(10151):919-928. PMC: 6137538. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31923-8. View

3.
Mobley B, Schechter E, Moore W, McKee P, Eichner J . Neural network predictions of significant coronary artery stenosis in men. Artif Intell Med. 2005; 34(2):151-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.08.003. View

4.
Wallentin L, Becker R, Budaj A, Cannon C, Emanuelsson H, Held C . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11):1045-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. View

5.
Yao W, Gao Y, Wan Z . Serum Metabolomics Profiling to Identify Biomarkers for Unstable Angina. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:7657306. PMC: 5463165. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7657306. View