» Articles » PMID: 38397699

The Effects of an Inclusive Badminton Program on Static Postural Control for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine static postural control/balance in young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and typically developing (TD) young adults before, during, and after an inclusive badminton intervention. Eight participants (four IDD-BADM and four TD-BADM) participated in a 12-week inclusive badminton intervention, with the other eight participants as matched controls (four IDD-CONTR and four TD-CONTR) (74.19 kg ± 9.8 kg, 171.96 cm ± 5.4 cm; 21.7 ± 1.8 years of age; nine females and seven males; eight with IDD and eight TD). The study followed a repeated measures design (pre, mid, post) before the intervention, at 6 weeks, and after 12 weeks. Static postural sway conditions included: bilateral stance eyes open (20 s), eyes closed (10 s), foam eyes open (20 s), foam eyes closed (10 s), and unilateral stance eyes open (10 s) and foam eyes open (10 s). Sway measurements included: average anterior/posterior (A/P) displacement (in), average medial/lateral (M/L) displacement (in), average 95% ellipsoid area (in), and average velocity (ft/s). Significant time × group interactions were reported for average velocity (EO) ( = 0.030), average length (EO) ( = 0.030), 95% ellipsoid area (EO) ( = 0.049), and average A/P displacement (1LEO) ( = 0.036) for IDD-BADM. Significant time main effects were reported for average A/P displacement (FEO) ( = 0.040) for IDD groups. Significant time main effects were reported for average M/L displacement (EO) ( = 0.001), (EC) ( = 0.004), (FEO) ( = 0.005), (FEC) ( = 0.004), and average A/P displacement (EO) ( = 0.006) and (FEO) ( = 0.005) for TD groups. An inclusive badminton program indicated evidence of improved static postural control for those with IDD. However, no significant differences were reported for TD peers.

References
1.
Sacrey L, Germani T, Bryson S, Zwaigenbaum L . Reaching and grasping in autism spectrum disorder: a review of recent literature. Front Neurol. 2014; 5:6. PMC: 3899541. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00006. View

2.
Schmitz C, Martineau J, Barthelemy C, Assaiante C . Motor control and children with autism: deficit of anticipatory function?. Neurosci Lett. 2003; 348(1):17-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00644-x. View

3.
Rinehart N, Bellgrove M, Tonge B, Brereton A, Howells-Rankin D, Bradshaw J . An examination of movement kinematics in young people with high-functioning autism and Asperger's disorder: further evidence for a motor planning deficit. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006; 36(6):757-67. PMC: 2000294. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0118-x. View

4.
Fournier K, Kimberg C, Radonovich K, Tillman M, Chow J, Lewis M . Decreased static and dynamic postural control in children with autism spectrum disorders. Gait Posture. 2010; 32(1):6-9. PMC: 2919314. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.007. View

5.
Sheppard J, Young W . Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(9):919-32. DOI: 10.1080/02640410500457109. View