» Articles » PMID: 38397291

Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Feb 24
PMID 38397291
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The European Standards of Care for Newborn Health (ESCNH) were launched in 2018. After three years, the first standards were reassessed and revised to align with current evidence. Moreover, new standards regarding emerging topics were developed. The aim of this paper is to outline the approach adopted for reassessing, revising and developing new standards for the ESCNH. We established a systematic approach to reassess the ESCNH including a public and an expert consultation. The public consultation was open to all stakeholders for feedback whereas the expert consultation followed a targeted consultation method. For developing new standards, a similar process to the original development was implemented. Overall, 20 standards were reassessed and six standards were developed. For the revision process, 23 experts were involved in the targeted consultation method and 253 questionnaires were completed via the open consultation. We demonstrated a systematic approach to update and extend reference standards, which can be applied by other developers of standards. Thereby, we highlighted that including a public and an expert consultation is crucial to improve quality and to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are integrated.

Citing Articles

Study protocol for the development and pilot-testing of a Self-assessment tool for the implementation of the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health (ESCNH).

Hoffmann J, Lehmann S, Ancora G, Hummler H, Lack N, Schlembach D BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025; 9(1.

PMID: 39837587 PMC: 11749526. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003008.


Correction: Geiger et al. Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence. 2024, , 179.

Geiger I, Kostenzer J, Matthaus V, The Escnh Chair Committee , Mader S, Zimmermann L Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929330 PMC: 11201605. DOI: 10.3390/children11060653.

References
1.
Madar J, Roehr C, Ainsworth S, Ersdal H, Morley C, Rudiger M . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth. Resuscitation. 2021; 161:291-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.014. View

2.
Qaseem A, Kansagara D, Lin J, Mustafa R, Wilt T, Forciea M . The Development of Clinical Guidelines and Guidance Statements by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians: Update of Methods. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(12):863-870. DOI: 10.7326/M18-3290. View

3.
Burgers J, Fervers B, Haugh M, Brouwers M, Browman G, Philip T . International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(10):2000-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157. View

4.
Perez-Romero C, Barrio G, Hoyos J, Belza M, Regidor E, Donat M . Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey. Front Public Health. 2023; 11:971239. PMC: 10140628. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239. View

5.
Munn Z, Brandt L, Kuijpers T, Whittington C, Wiles L, Karge T . Are systematic review and guideline development tools useful? A Guidelines International Network survey of user preferences. JBI Evid Implement. 2020; 18(3):345-352. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000226. View