» Articles » PMID: 38396016

Mechanical Characteristics of Glioblastoma and Peritumoral Tumor-free Human Brain Tissue

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38396016
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of brain tumor is a serious event for the affected patient. Surgical resection is a crucial part in the treatment of brain tumors. However, the distinction between tumor and brain tissue can be difficult, even for experienced neurosurgeons. This is especially true in the case of gliomas. In this project we examined whether the biomechanical parameters elasticity and stress relaxation behavior are suitable as additional differentiation criteria between tumorous (glioblastoma multiforme; glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; GBM) and non-tumorous, peritumoral tissue.

Methods: Indentation measurements were used to examine non-tumorous human brain tissue and GBM samples for the biomechanical properties of elasticity and stress-relaxation behavior. The results of these measurements were then used in a classification algorithm (Logistic Regression) to distinguish between tumor and non-tumor.

Results: Differences could be found in elasticity spread and relaxation behavior between tumorous and non-tumorous tissue. Classification was successful with a sensitivity/recall of 83% (sd = 12%) and a precision of 85% (sd = 9%) for detecting tumorous tissue.

Conclusion: The findings imply that the data on mechanical characteristics, with particular attention to stress relaxation behavior, can serve as an extra element in differentiating tumorous brain tissue from non-tumorous brain tissue.

References
1.
Eichberg D, Shah A, Di L, Semonche A, Jimsheleishvili G, Luther E . Stimulated Raman histology for rapid and accurate intraoperative diagnosis of CNS tumors: prospective blinded study. J Neurosurg. 2019; 134(1):137-143. DOI: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS192075. View

2.
Stewart D, Rubiano A, Dyson K, Simmons C . Mechanical characterization of human brain tumors from patients and comparison to potential surgical phantoms. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0177561. PMC: 5459328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177561. View

3.
Zeng L, Mei Q, Li H, Ke C, Yu J, Chen J . A survival analysis of surgically treated incidental low-grade glioma patients. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):8522. PMC: 8055980. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88023-y. View

4.
Belykh E, Miller E, Carotenuto A, Patel A, Cavallo C, Martirosyan N . Progress in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Neurosurgery and Technical Nuances for Brain Tumor Imaging With Fluorescein. Front Oncol. 2019; 9:554. PMC: 6616132. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00554. View

5.
Zhang M, Zheng Y, Mak A . Estimating the effective Young's modulus of soft tissues from indentation tests--nonlinear finite element analysis of effects of friction and large deformation. Med Eng Phys. 1997; 19(6):512-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(97)00017-9. View