» Articles » PMID: 38395845

Oncological Risk of Proximal Gastrectomy for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38395845
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the metastasis rate of the key distal lymph nodes (KDLN) that are not routinely dissected in proximal gastrectomy, aiming to explore the oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 150 patients with proximal locally advanced gastric cancer (cT3/4 before chemotherapy) from two high-volume cancer centers in China who received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. Metastasis rate of the KDLN (No.5/6/12a) and the risk factors were analyzed.

Results: Key distal lymph node metastasis was detected in 10% (15/150) of patients, with a metastasis rate of 6% (9/150) in No. 5 lymph nodes, 6.7% (10/150) in No. 6 lymph nodes, and 2.7% (2/75) in No. 12a lymph nodes. The therapeutic value index of KDLN as one entity is 5.8. Tumor length showed no correlation with KDLN metastasis, while tumor regression grade (TRG) emerged as an independent risk factor (OR: 1.47; p-value: 0.04). Of those with TRG3 (no response to NAC), 80% (12/15) was found with KDLN metastasis.

Conclusion: For cT3/4 proximal locally advanced gastric cancer patients, the risk of KDLN metastasis remains notably high even after NAC. Therefore, proximal gastrectomy is not recommended; instead, total gastrectomy with thorough distal lymphadenectomy is the preferred surgical approach.

Citing Articles

Carcinoembryonic antigen trajectory predicts pathological complete response in advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chen Y, Liu D, Wei K, Lin Y, Wang Z, Sun Q Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1525324.

PMID: 39995833 PMC: 11847669. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1525324.


Prognosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A 2024 Update.

Burz C, Pop V, Silaghi C, Lupan I, Samasca G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730659 PMC: 11083929. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091708.


Correction: Oncological risk of proximal gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chen Y, Chen X, Lin Y, Zhang S, Zhou Z, Peng J BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):314.

PMID: 38448865 PMC: 10918980. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12066-3.

References
1.
Xie Y, Shi L, He X, Luo Y . Gastrointestinal cancers in China, the USA, and Europe. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2021; 9(2):91-104. PMC: 8128023. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab010. View

2.
Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tokunaga M . Impact of Malnutrition After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Long-Term Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(4):974-983. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8. View

3.
Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T . Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 18(2):407-16. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-014-0377-8. View

4.
Ri M, Kumagai K, Namikawa K, Atsumi S, Hayami M, Makuuchi R . Is proximal gastrectomy indicated for locally advanced cancer in the upper third of the stomach?. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021; 5(6):767-775. PMC: 8560615. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12486. View

5.
Yura M, Yoshikawa T, Otsuki S, Yamagata Y, Morita S, Katai H . Oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for T2/T3 proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019; 22(5):1029-1035. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00938-8. View