» Articles » PMID: 38394534

Comparison of Manual Chest Compression Versus Mechanical Chest Compression for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38394534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate intervention to increase the prospect of survival. There are various ways to achieve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in such patients, either through manual chest compression or mechanical chest compression. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the differences between these interventions.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were explored from inception to May 2023. Additionally, the bibliographies of relevant studies were searched. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-I tools were utilized to perform quality and risk of bias assessments.

Results: There were 24 studies included within this quantitative synthesis, featuring a total of 111,681 cardiac arrest patients. Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between the return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, short-term survival, and long-term survival. However, manual chest compression was associated with a significantly superior favorability of neurological outcomes (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.84; P = .01).

Conclusion: Although there were no major differences between the strategies, the poorer post-resuscitation neurological outcomes observed in mechanical chest compression indicate the need for further innovation and advancements within the current array of mechanical devices. However, future high-quality studies are necessary in order to arrive at a valid conclusion.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting the return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients.

Avci A, Yolcu S, Simsek Y, Yesiloglu O, Avci B, Guven R Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(52):e40966.

PMID: 39969385 PMC: 11688071. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040966.


An update on the mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients.

El-Menyar A, Naduvilekandy M Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):340.

PMID: 39438999 PMC: 11495071. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05131-7.


Mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): an umbrella review of contemporary systematic reviews and more.

El-Menyar A, Naduvilekandy M, Rizoli S, Di Somma S, Cander B, Galwankar S Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):259.

PMID: 39080740 PMC: 11290300. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05037-4.

References
1.
Ong M, Ornato J, Edwards D, Dhindsa H, Best A, Ines C . Use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA. 2006; 295(22):2629-37. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.22.2629. View

2.
Casner M, Andersen D, Isaacs S . The impact of a new CPR assist device on rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9(1):61-7. DOI: 10.1080/10903120590891714. View

3.
Wik L, Olsen J, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano Jr M, Brouwer M . Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6):741-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.005. View

4.
. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV1-203. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166550. View

5.
Newberry R, Redman T, Ross E, Ely R, Saidler C, Arana A . No Benefit in Neurologic Outcomes of Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Mechanical Compression Device. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018; 22(3):338-344. DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1394405. View