» Articles » PMID: 38393457

The Diagnostic Performance of Cr/CysC for Sarcopenia and Its Predictive Value on Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Eur Geriatr Med
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38393457
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The utilization of the creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (Cr/CysC) represents an innovative method for predicting sarcopenia. Our objectives encompassed the evaluation of sarcopenia diagnostic accuracy for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score, as well as an exploration of the predictive value of Cr/CysC concerning clinical outcomes within hospitalized older individuals.

Methods: We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated areas under the curves (AUCs) to assess the diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, we applied univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of risk factors affecting prognosis.

Results: Our study included 312 participants, comprising 167 men and 145 women, with an average age of 71 years. Among males, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.717 [95% CI 0.642-0.784], 0.669 (95% CI 0.592-0.739), 0.845 (95% CI 0.781-0.896), 0.882 (95% CI 0.823-0.926), and 0.938 (95% CI 0.890-0.969), respectively. In females, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.706 (95% CI 0.625-0.779), 0.631 (95% CI 0.547-0.710), 0.763 (95% CI 0.686-0.830), 0.789 (95% CI 0.714-0.853), and 0.898 (95% CI 0.837-0.942), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, physical exercise, smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cancer, sarcopenia identified by Cr/CysC (adjusted HR = 2.176, 95% CI 1.062-4.460, P = 0.034) was independently associated with poor overall survival in hospitalized older patients.

Conclusions: Cr/CysC has satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia diagnosis and predictive value for poor outcomes in hospitalized older patients. The combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF may provide a more accurate screening for sarcopenia and the Ishii score may be the most accurate clinical method for detecting sarcopenia.

Citing Articles

Correlation of lung function and sarcopenia in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and analysis of factors influencing sarcopenia.

Yang X, Wei Y, Zhao J, Bai Y Am J Transl Res. 2025; 17(1):358-376.

PMID: 39959237 PMC: 11826181. DOI: 10.62347/OGUT1532.


Sex differences in the association between sarcopenia index and sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study from a Chinese community-based population.

Yang H, Huang Y, Jiang G, Duan Z, Du R, Hao Y Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 16(1):55-65.

PMID: 39623162 PMC: 11850426. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-01111-w.

References
1.
Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T . Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2018; 48(1):16-31. PMC: 6322506. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. View

2.
Norman K, Otten L . Financial impact of sarcopenia or low muscle mass - A short review. Clin Nutr. 2018; 38(4):1489-1495. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.09.026. View

3.
Janssen I, Shepard D, Katzmarzyk P, Roubenoff R . The healthcare costs of sarcopenia in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 52(1):80-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52014.x. View

4.
Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray S, Lara J, Ho F, Pell J . Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021; 13(1):86-99. PMC: 8818604. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12783. View

5.
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K . Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. View