» Articles » PMID: 38392923

The Community Pharmacy As a Study Center for the Epidemiological Analysis of the Population Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2: Evaluation of Vaccine Safety and Pharmaceutical Service

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38392923
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We conducted a monocentric observational study aimed at evaluating the vaccine safety and the pharmaceutical service provided at a community pharmacy (C.PHARM) in the Puglia Region in the period from 29 December 2021 to 12 March 2022 using data from 550 patients of various ages and sexes and with concomitant diseases. We collected anamnestic data, the number of hospitalizations, and any post-vaccination adverse reactions. Interviews using the integrated EQ5 method were also performed to evaluate the quality of the service offered and any therapy preference. As expected, the vaccines were reactogenic after the first dose in the patients with mild-moderate reactions, with younger age and female gender as risk factors. Immune-allergic reactions of a moderate-severe degree were observed in adult females. In the elderly, the vaccination was well tolerated. Comirnaty showed a favorable O.R. < 1 vs. other vaccines. No cardiovascular events or hospitalizations were observed up to May 2023. Regional data indicate that all treatments during May 2023 were correlated with the viremia. Paxlovid was prescribed in 3% of the patients in our center and in 1.46% in the region, and distributed/dispensed on behalf of third parties in accordance with a novel distribution/dispensation protocol of the C.PHARM that resulted in a safe vaccination center providing appropriate patient inclusion during vaccination.

References
1.
Lang K . How do we best use Paxlovid and other covid antivirals?. BMJ. 2023; 382:1666. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p1666. View

2.
Corrao G, Franchi M, Cereda D, Bortolan F, Zoli A, Leoni O . Persistence of protection against SARS-CoV-2 clinical outcomes up to 9 months since vaccine completion: a retrospective observational analysis in Lombardy, Italy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22(5):649-656. PMC: 8797009. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00813-6. View

3.
Kalinke U, Barouch D, Rizzi R, Lagkadinou E, Tureci O, Pather S . Clinical development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022; 21(5):609-619. PMC: 8935460. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2042257. View

4.
Finney Rutten L, Zhu X, Leppin A, Ridgeway J, Swift M, Griffin J . Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021; 96(3):699-707. PMC: 7772995. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.024. View

5.
Lincoln A, Dixon-Ibarra A, Hanley J, Smith A, Martin K, Bazzano A . Global report on COVID-19 vaccination and reasons not to vaccinate among adults with intellectual disabilities: Results from secondary analyses of Special Olympics' program planning. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(6):e0001367. PMC: 10263337. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001367. View