» Articles » PMID: 38392456

Factors Associated with Revictimization in Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38392456
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study conducted a meta-analysis to identify the primary risk and protective factors associated with the revictimization in intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). Out of 2382 studies initially identified in eight databases, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and provided the necessary data for calculating pooled effect sizes. The analysis focused on non-manipulative quantitative studies examining revictimization in heterosexual women of legal age. Separate statistical analyses were performed for prospective and retrospective studies, resulting in findings related to 14 variables. The Metafor package in RStudio was used with a random-effects model. The meta-analysis revealed that childhood abuse was the most strongly associated risk factor for revictimization, while belonging to a white ethnicity was the most prominent protective factor. Other significant risk factors included alcohol and drug use, recent physical violence, severity of violence, and PTSD symptomatology. The study also found that older age was a protective factor in prospective studies. The consistency of results across different study designs and sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of the findings. It is important to note that the existing literature on revictimization in women facing intimate partner violence is limited and exhibits significant heterogeneity in terms of methodology and conceptual frameworks.

Citing Articles

Causal and common risk pathways linking childhood maltreatment to later intimate partner violence victimization.

Pezzoli P, Pingault J, Eley T, McCrory E, Viding E Mol Psychiatry. 2024; .

PMID: 39488656 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02813-0.


Causal and common risk pathways linking childhood maltreatment to later intimate partner violence victimization.

Patrizia P, Pingault J, Eley T, McCrory E, Viding E Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38883746 PMC: 11177992. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4409798/v1.


[Dialectical behavioral therapy for complex posttraumatic stress disorder (DBT-PTSD): an evidence-based disorder-specific treatment program].

Bohus M, Vonderlin R Nervenarzt. 2024; 95(7):630-638.

PMID: 38874612 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-024-01680-y.

References
1.
Testa M, Livingston J, Leonard K . Women's substance use and experiences of intimate partner violence: a longitudinal investigation among a community sample. Addict Behav. 2003; 28(9):1649-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.040. View

2.
Manterola C, Astudillo P, Arias E, Claros N . [Systematic reviews of the literature: what should be known about them]. Cir Esp. 2011; 91(3):149-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.07.009. View

3.
Gao W, Paterson J, Abbott M, Carter S, Iusitini L, McDonald-Sundborn G . Impact of current and past intimate partner violence on maternal mental health and behaviour at 2 years after childbirth: evidence from the Pacific Islands Families Study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010; 44(2):174-82. DOI: 10.3109/00048670903487126. View

4.
Cole J, Logan T, Shannon L . Women's risk for revictimization by a new abusive partner: for what should we be looking?. Violence Vict. 2008; 23(3):315-30. DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.3.315. View

5.
Houry D, Parramore C, Fayard G, Thorn J, Heron S, Kellermann A . Characteristics of household addresses that repeatedly contact 911 to report intimate partner violence. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(6):662-7. View