» Articles » PMID: 38392040

Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Feb 23
PMID 38392040
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients' physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, 'surgery schools', and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation.

Citing Articles

Optimisation of the preparation phase for orthopaedic surgery: Study protocol for a student-led multimodal prehabilitation feasibility trial (BoneFit).

Ingle L, Snook J, Smith L, Oliver B, Bray J, Wells L PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314680.

PMID: 39937759 PMC: 11819578. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314680.


Prehabilitation approaches for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a narrative review.

Girnyi S, Marano L, Skokowski J, Mocarski P, Kycler W, Gallo G Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025; 29(5):614-626.

PMID: 39759553 PMC: 11698552. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.103136.


Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Prehabilitation: Advantages and Limitations.

Demurtas S, Cena H, Benazzo M, Gabanelli P, Porcelli S, Preda L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458125 PMC: 11509296. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206176.

References
1.
Varadhan K, Neal K, Dejong C, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Lobo D . The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010; 29(4):434-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004. View

2.
Prado C, Lieffers J, McCargar L, Reiman T, Sawyer M, Martin L . Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(7):629-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0. View

3.
Inouye S, van Dyck C, Alessi C, Balkin S, Siegal A, Horwitz R . Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 113(12):941-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941. View

4.
Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, Loiselle S, Minnella E, Agnihotram R, Bergdahl A . Evaluation of supervised multimodal prehabilitation programme in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection: a randomized control trial. Acta Oncol. 2018; 57(6):849-859. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1423180. View

5.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View