» Articles » PMID: 38391650

Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly used technique for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. In this study, we developed a fully computer-supported pipeline to predict both the cage height and the degree of lumbar lordosis subtraction from the pelvic incidence (PI-LL) after TLIF surgery, utilizing preoperative X-ray images. The automated pipeline comprised two primary stages. First, the pretrained BiLuNet deep learning model was employed to extract essential features from X-ray images. Subsequently, five machine learning algorithms were trained using a five-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset of 311 patients to identify the optimal models to predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. LASSO regression and support vector regression demonstrated superior performance in predicting interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL, respectively. For cage height prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated as 1.01, and the model achieved the highest accuracy at a height of 12 mm, with exact prediction achieved in 54.43% (43/79) of cases. In most of the remaining cases, the prediction error of the model was within 1 mm. Additionally, the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting PI-LL, with an RMSE of 5.19 and an accuracy of 0.81 for PI-LL stratification. In conclusion, our results indicate that machine learning models can reliably predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL.

Citing Articles

Prevention and management of degenerative lumbar spine disorders through artificial intelligence-based decision support systems: a systematic review.

Giaccone P, DAntoni F, Russo F, Ambrosio L, Papalia G, dAngelis O BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):126.

PMID: 39915847 PMC: 11803955. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08356-x.


Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.

Kenig N, Monton Echeverria J, Muntaner Vives A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685566 PMC: 11642125. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237108.


Cutting-Edge Machine Learning in Biomedical Image Analysis: Editorial for Special Issue: "Recent Advance of Machine Learning in Biomedical Image Analysis".

Lian S, Luo Z Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593766 PMC: 11591837. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111106.

References
1.
Mummaneni P, Dhall S, Eck J, Groff M, Ghogawala Z, Watters 3rd W . Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21(1):67-74. DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14276. View

2.
Porche K, Dru A, Moor R, Kubilis P, Vaziri S, Hoh D . Preoperative Radiographic Prediction Tool for Early Postoperative Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Alignment After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Cureus. 2021; 13(9):e18175. PMC: 8530555. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18175. View

3.
Gambhir S, Wang T, Pelletier M, Walsh W, Ball J . How Does Cage Lordosis Influence Postoperative Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2019; 126:e606-e611. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.100. View

4.
Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J, Lafage V . Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(25):2224-31. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4. View

5.
Ould-Slimane M, Lenoir T, Dauzac C, Rillardon L, Hoffmann E, Guigui P . Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(6):1200-6. PMC: 3366140. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2124-8. View