The Role of Mental Health and Protective Factors in Student Academic Persistence and Retention During a Global Crisis

Overview

Journal Glob Ment Health (Camb)

Publisher Cambridge University Press

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Feb 23

PMID 38390245

Authors

Yusen Zhai

JoLynn V Carney

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated challenges for millions of students globally, leading to enrollment cliff. This study addresses the existing research gap by investigating the influence of students' mental health and various protective factors (i.e., optimism, help-seeking behaviors, social support) on academic persistence, an indicator of student retention. We utilized the structural equation modeling approach to examine the effect of students' mental health conditions, risk perception of COVID-19 and protective factors on academic persistence through a sample of 1,051 students from 45 states. Students' mental health positively predicted academic persistence. Risk perception of COVID-19 was negatively associated with mental health but positively predicted academic persistence and help-seeking behaviors. Optimism fully mediated the effect of mental health on help-seeking behaviors but did not mediate the effect of risk perception on help-seeking behaviors. Social support positively predicted academic persistence. This study underscores the integral role of mental health and protective factors in supporting student retention. Universities should develop targeted programs to address students' mental health needs and promote protective behaviors. These initiatives can enhance academic persistence, thereby aiding in the retention of students affected by this pandemic or any future global crisis.

References

Park T, Ju I, Ohs J, Hinsley A . Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020; 17(1):1859-1866. PMC: 7836537. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004. View

Zhai Y, Du X . Trends and prevalence of suicide 2017-2021 and its association with COVID-19: Interrupted time series analysis of a national sample of college students in the United States. Psychiatry Res. 2022; 316:114796. PMC: 9375853. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114796. View

Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

Zhai Y, Du X . Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 288:113003. PMC: 7162776. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003. View

Steiger J . Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 25(2):173-80. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4. View

Carver C, Scheier M . Dispositional optimism. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(6):293-9. PMC: 4061570. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003. View

Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust S . Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Med Care. 2007; 45(7):594-601. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb4c1. View

Liao Q, Cowling B, Lam W, Ng D, Fielding R . Anxiety, worry and cognitive risk estimate in relation to protective behaviors during the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong: ten cross-sectional surveys. BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14:169. PMC: 3986671. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-169. View

Wilson C, Deane F, Ciarrochi J . Can hopelessness and adolescents' beliefs and attitudes about seeking help account for help negation?. J Clin Psychol. 2005; 61(12):1525-39. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20206. View

10.

Petherick A, Goldszmidt R, Andrade E, Furst R, Hale T, Pott A . A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(9):1145-1160. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01181-x. View

11.

Skalski S, Uram P, Dobrakowski P, Kwiatkowska A . The link between ego-resiliency, social support, SARS-CoV-2 anxiety and trauma effects. Polish adaptation of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale. Pers Individ Dif. 2020; 171:110540. PMC: 7670928. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110540. View

12.

Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J . The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287:112934. PMC: 7102633. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. View

13.

Kessler R, Walters E, Forthofer M . The social consequences of psychiatric disorders, III: probability of marital stability. Am J Psychiatry. 1998; 155(8):1092-6. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.155.8.1092. View

14.

Crane M, Shermock K, Omer S, Romley J . Change in Reported Adherence to Nonpharmaceutical Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic, April-November 2020. JAMA. 2021; 325(9):883-885. PMC: 7823422. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.0286. View

15.

Cohen J . A power primer. Psychol Bull. 2009; 112(1):155-9. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. View

16.

Herzberg P, Glaesmer H, Hoyer J . Separating optimism and pessimism: a robust psychometric analysis of the revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychol Assess. 2006; 18(4):433-438. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.433. View

17.

Scheier M, Carver C, Bridges M . Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 67(6):1063-78. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063. View

18.

Aspinwall L, Taylor S . Modeling cognitive adaptation: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992; 63(6):989-1003. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.989. View

19.

Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

20.

Finset A, Bosworth H, Butow P, Gulbrandsen P, Hulsman R, Pieterse A . Effective health communication - a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Educ Couns. 2020; 103(5):873-876. PMC: 7180027. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027. View