» Articles » PMID: 38388799

Inclusion of a Computerized Test in ADHD Diagnosis Process Can Improve Trust in the Specialists' Decision and Elevate Adherence Levels

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Feb 22
PMID 38388799
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects many life aspects of children and adults. Accurate identification, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD can facilitate better care. However, ADHD diagnosis and treatment methods are subject of controversy. Objective measures can elevate trust in specialist's decision and treatment adherence. In this observational study we asked whether knowing that a computerized test was included in ADHD diagnosis process results in more trust and intention to adhere with treatment recommendations. Questionnaires were administered to 459 people, 196 men, average age = 40.57 (8.90). Questions regarding expected trust and adherence, trust trait, trust in physician and health-care-institutions, and ADHD scales followed a scenario about parents referred to a neurologist for sons' ADHD diagnosis. The scenario presented to the test group (n = 185) mentioned that a computerized test was part of the diagnostic process. The control group scenario didn't mention any computerized test in the diagnostic process. Test group participants expressed more trust in the diagnosis and greater levels of intention for treatment adherence. Group differences in intention for treatment adherence were mediated by trust in decision. Inclusion of a computerized test in ADHD diagnosis process can improve trust in the specialists' decision and elevate adherence levels.

References
1.
Pezzo M, Nash B, Vieux P, Foster-Grammer H . Effect of Having, but Not Consulting, a Computerized Diagnostic Aid. Med Decis Making. 2021; 42(1):94-104. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211011160. View

2.
Benin A, Wisler-Scher D, Colson E, Shapiro E, Holmboe E . Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(5):1532-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1728. View

3.
DuPaul G, Kern L, Belk G, Custer B, Daffner M, Hatfield A . Face-to-Face Versus Online Behavioral Parent Training for Young Children at Risk for ADHD: Treatment Engagement and Outcomes. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017; 47(sup1):S369-S383. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1342544. View

4.
Hall C, Valentine A, Groom M, Walker G, Sayal K, Daley D . The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015; 25(7):677-99. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0798-x. View

5.
Wehmeier P, Schacht A, Barkley R . Social and emotional impairment in children and adolescents with ADHD and the impact on quality of life. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 46(3):209-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.09.009. View