» Articles » PMID: 38388724

Recovering Whole-body Angular Momentum and Margin of Stability After Treadmill-induced Perturbations During Sloped Walking in Healthy Young Adults

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Feb 22
PMID 38388724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although humans are well-adapted to negotiating sloped terrain, balance recovery after a disturbance on slopes is poorly understood. This study investigated how slope affects recovery from unanticipated simulated trips and slips. Eighteen healthy young adults walked on a split-belt treadmill at 1.25 m/s and three slope angles (downhill: - 8°; level: 0°; uphill: + 8°), with slip- and trip-like perturbations applied randomly at heel-strike. We evaluated balance recovery using whole-body angular momentum (WBAM) and perturbation response (PR), for which larger PR values indicate greater deviation of the margin of stability from baseline, therefore, greater destabilisation after perturbation. Overall, trips were more destabilising than slips, producing larger PR and greater range and integral of WBAM across all tested slopes, most significantly in the sagittal plane. Contrary to expectation, sagittal-plane PR post-trip was greatest for level walking and smallest for downhill walking. Heightened vigilance during downhill walking may explain this finding. Recovery strategy in both frontal and sagittal planes was consistent across all slopes and perturbation types, characterized by a wider and shorter first recovery step, with trips requiring the greatest step adjustment. Our findings advance understanding of the robustness of human locomotion and may offer insights into fall prevention interventions.

Citing Articles

Balance recovery schemes following mediolateral gyroscopic moment perturbations during walking.

Mohseni O, Mahmoudi A, Firouzi V, Seyfarth A, Vallery H, Sharbafi M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315414.

PMID: 39739770 PMC: 11687818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315414.

References
1.
Roeles S, Rowe P, Bruijn S, Childs C, Tarfali G, Steenbrink F . Gait stability in response to platform, belt, and sensory perturbations in young and older adults. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018; 56(12):2325-2335. PMC: 6245003. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1855-7. View

2.
Pijnappels M, Bobbert M, van Dieen J . Push-off reactions in recovery after tripping discriminate young subjects, older non-fallers and older fallers. Gait Posture. 2005; 21(4):388-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.04.009. View

3.
Kuster M, Sakurai S, Wood G . Kinematic and kinetic comparison of downhill and level walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1995; 10(2):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)92043-l. View

4.
Haggerty M, Dickin D, Popp J, Wang H . The influence of incline walking on joint mechanics. Gait Posture. 2014; 39(4):1017-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.027. View

5.
Hof A, Gazendam M, Sinke W . The condition for dynamic stability. J Biomech. 2004; 38(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.025. View