» Articles » PMID: 38386947

Overcoming Barriers to Discovery and Implementation of Equitable Pharmacogenomic Testing in Oncology

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Feb 22
PMID 38386947
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx), the study of inherited genomic variation and drug response or safety, is a vital tool in precision medicine. In oncology, testing to identify PGx variants offers patients the opportunity for customized treatments that can minimize adverse effects and maximize the therapeutic benefits of drugs used for cancer treatment and supportive care. Because individuals of shared ancestry share specific genetic variants, PGx factors may contribute to outcome disparities across racial and ethnic categories when genetic ancestry is not taken into account or mischaracterized in PGx research, discovery, and application. Here, we examine how the current scientific understanding of the role of PGx in differential oncology safety and outcomes may be biased toward a greater understanding and more complete clinical implementation of PGx for individuals of European descent compared with other genetic ancestry groups. We discuss the implications of this bias for PGx discovery, access to care, drug labeling, and patient and provider understanding and use of PGx approaches. Testing for somatic genetic variants is now the standard of care in treatment of many solid tumors, but the integration of PGx into oncology care is still lacking despite demonstrated actionable findings from PGx testing, reduction in avoidable toxicity and death, and return on investment from testing. As the field of oncology is poised to expand and integrate germline genetic variant testing, it is vital that PGx discovery and application are equitable for all populations. Recommendations are introduced to address barriers to facilitate effective and equitable PGx application in cancer care.

Citing Articles

The Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network Implementation Working Group: global collaboration to advance pharmacogenetic implementation.

Cavallari L, Hicks J, Patel J, Elchynski A, Smith D, Bargal S Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2024; 35(1):1-11.

PMID: 39485373 PMC: 11664750. DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000547.


Roadmap for the next generation of Children's Oncology Group rhabdomyosarcoma trials.

Metts J, Aye J, Crane J, Oberoi S, Balis F, Bhatia S Cancer. 2024; 130(22):3785-3796.

PMID: 38941509 PMC: 11511643. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35457.

References
1.
van der Lee M, Kriek M, Guchelaar H, Swen J . Technologies for Pharmacogenomics: A Review. Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(12). PMC: 7761897. DOI: 10.3390/genes11121456. View

2.
Caudle K, Thorn C, Klein T, Swen J, McLeod H, Diasio R . Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype and fluoropyrimidine dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 94(6):640-5. PMC: 3831181. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2013.172. View

3.
Rasmussen-Torvik L, Stallings S, Gordon A, Almoguera B, Basford M, Bielinski S . Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 96(4):482-9. PMC: 4169732. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2014.137. View

4.
Morris S, Alsaidi A, Verbyla A, Cruz A, Macfarlane C, Bauer J . Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 112(6):1318-1328. PMC: 9828439. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2754. View

5.
Goh L, Lim C, Leong K, Ong K . and testing for thiopurine therapy: A major tertiary hospital experience and lessons learned. Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:837164. PMC: 9537458. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.837164. View