» Articles » PMID: 38386786

Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Risk of Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int Braz J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2024 Feb 22
PMID 38386786
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to perform a high-quality meta-analysis using only randomized controlled trials (RCT) to better define the role of postoperative antibiotics in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials And Methods: A literature search for RCTs in EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science up to May 2023 was conducted following the PICO framework: Population-adult patients who underwent PCNL; Intervention-postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal; Control-single dose of antibiotic during the induction of anesthesia; and Outcome-systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and fever after PCNL. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022361579). We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A random-effects model was employed, and the alpha risk was defined as < 0.05.

Results: Seven articles, encompassing a total of 629 patients, were included in the analysis. The outcome of SIRS or sepsis was extracted from six of the included studies, while the outcome of postoperative fever was extracted from four studies. The analysis revealed no statistical association between the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal and the occurrence of SIRS/sepsis (OR 1.236, 95% CI 0.731 - 2.089, p=0.429) or fever (OR 2.049, 95% CI 0.790 - 5.316, p=0.140).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there is no benefit associated with the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We recommend that antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered only until the induction of anesthesia in PCNL.

Citing Articles

Is it worth using the Comprehensive Complication Index over the Clavien-Dindo classification in elderly patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy?.

Danilovic A, Perrone G, Dias L, Marchini G, Torricelli F, Batagello C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):599.

PMID: 39466501 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05318-1.


Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: an analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications.

Kolanukuduru K, Zaytoun O, Tillu N, Mandel A, Dovey Z, Buscarini M Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(6):737-745.

PMID: 39133794 PMC: 11554283. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0308.


Risk of infection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the hot topic in this number of the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Favorito L Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(5):516-518.

PMID: 39106112 PMC: 11446558. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.05.01.

References
1.
Dogan H, Sahin A, Cetinkaya Y, Akdogan B, Ozden E, Kendi S . Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study in 81 patients. J Endourol. 2002; 16(9):649-53. DOI: 10.1089/089277902761402989. View

2.
Gutierrez J, Smith A, Geavlete P, Shah H, Kural A, De Sio M . Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2012; 31(5):1135-40. PMC: 3785702. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0836-y. View

3.
Levy M, Fink M, Marshall J, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D . 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(4):1250-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B. View

4.
Berrios-Torres S, Umscheid C, Bratzler D, Leas B, Stone E, Kelz R . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(8):784-791. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. View

5.
Zhou G, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang D, Zhou S, Zhong J . The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022; 51(1):17. PMC: 9750925. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5. View