» Articles » PMID: 38379810

Impact of an Inpatient Pharmacist-driven Renal Dosing Policy on Order Verification Time and Patient Safety

Overview
Journal SAGE Open Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 21
PMID 38379810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research regarding pharmacist-driven renal dosing policies has focused on cost savings or prevention of adverse drug events. However, little is known about how these policies influence time from order signature to order verification or how this efficiency may reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes. The primary endpoint compared time from prescriber electronic order signature to pharmacist electronic order verification between pre- and post-renal dosing policy implementation. The secondary endpoint evaluated electrocardiogram QTc prolongation attributed to fluconazole accumulation in renal impairment. This retrospective analysis included adults with a creatine clearance ⩽50 mL/min who received at least two inpatient doses from a 34-medication renal dosing protocol between January-February 2020 and April-May 2020. 502 patients met eligibility for the primary outcome. The pre- and post-policy cohorts shared similar baseline characteristics. Time from order signature to verification was 9 and 8 min in the pre- and post-policy groups, respectively ( = 0.0861). In all, 56 patients met inclusion criteria for the secondary outcome. The QTc interval during fluconazole increased relative to baseline in 3 of 7 (43%) pre-policy and 4 of 5 (80%) post-policy. The QTc interval exceeded 500 ms in two patients, both in the post-policy cohort. There was no difference in order signature to verification time. Post-policy fluconazole renal adjustment did not reduce QTc prolongation.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Berger F, van der Sijs H, Becker M, van Gelder T, Van den Bemt P . Development and validation of a tool to assess the risk of QT drug-drug interactions in clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):171. PMC: 7376881. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01181-3. View

3.
Lee J, Dang A . Evaluation of methods to estimate glomerular filtration rate versus actual drug clearance in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49(12):1158-63. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.82. View

4.
Hassan Y, Al-Ramahi R, Aziz N, Ghazali R . Impact of a renal drug dosing service on dose adjustment in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43(10):1598-605. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1M187. View

5.
Kong K, Ong S, Ooi G, Hassali M . Measuring the proportion of time spent on work activities of clinical pharmacists using work sampling technique at a public hospital in Malaysia. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021; 19(3):2469. PMC: 8456338. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.3.2469. View