» Articles » PMID: 38379056

Variations in Irradiation Energy and Rose Bengal Concentration for Photodynamic Antimicrobial Therapy of Fungal Keratitis Isolates

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Feb 21
PMID 38379056
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose is to assess the efficacy of rose bengal photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) using different irradiation energy levels and photosensitizer concentrations for the inhibition of fungal keratitis isolates. Seven different fungi (Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, Curvularia lunata, Fusarium keratoplasticum, Fusarium solani, Paecilomyces variotii, and Pseudallescheria boydii) were isolated from patients with confirmed infectious keratitis. Experiments were performed in triplicate with suspensions of each fungus exposed to different PDAT parameters including a control, green light exposure of 5.4 J/cm, 2.7 J/cm (continuous and pulsed), and 1.8 J/cm and rose bengal concentrations of 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0.01%. Plates were photographed 72 h after experimentation, and analysis was performed to assess fungal growth inhibition. PDAT using 5.4 J/cm of irradiation and 0.1% rose bengal completely inhibited growth of five of the seven fungal species. Candida albicans and Fusarium keratoplasticum were the most susceptible organisms, with growth inhibited with the lowest fluence and minimum rose bengal concentration. Fusarium solani, Pseudallescheria boydii, and Paecilomyces variotii were inhibited by lower light exposures and photosensitizer concentrations. Aspergillus fumigatus and Curvularia lunata were not inhibited by any PDAT parameters tested. Continuous and pulsed irradiation using 2.7 J/cm produced similar results. Rose bengal PDAT successfully inhibits the in vitro growth of five fungi known to cause infectious keratitis. Differences in growth inhibition of the various fungi to multiple PDAT parameters suggest that susceptibilities to PDAT are unique among fungal species. These findings support modifying PDAT parameters based on the infectious etiology.

References
1.
Jeng B . Challenges in the Management of Fungal Keratitis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017; 135(6):525-526. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0722. View

2.
Miller D . Update on the Epidemiology and Antibiotic Resistance of Ocular Infections. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017; 24(1):30-42. PMC: 5433126. DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_276_16. View

3.
Lalitha P, Prajna N, Manoharan G, Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Das M . Trends in bacterial and fungal keratitis in South India, 2002-2012. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 99(2):192-4. PMC: 7325420. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305000. View

4.
Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J . Update on the Management of Infectious Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124(11):1678-1689. PMC: 5710829. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.012. View

5.
Gopinathan U, Garg P, Fernandes M, Sharma S, Athmanathan S, Rao G . The epidemiological features and laboratory results of fungal keratitis: a 10-year review at a referral eye care center in South India. Cornea. 2002; 21(6):555-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200208000-00004. View