Interim 1-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Hydroxyapatite-Infused Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages

Overview

Journal Int J Spine Surg

Date 2024 Feb 20

PMID 38378231

Authors

Michael J Kelly

Bradley Gelfand

Kris Radcliff

Fred F Mo

Brox A Felix

S Babak Kalantar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This is a multicenter observational registry analysis of 1-year radiographic and clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using hydroxyapatite (HA)-infused polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cages.

Methods: Radiographic and clinical outcome data were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. To assess fusion, dynamic flexion-extension radiographs were independently evaluated with a validated method. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the following disease-specific measures: Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck, left arm, and right arm pain. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated.

Results: A total of 789 ACDF patients (men: 51.5%/women: 48.5%; mean body mass index: 29.9 kg/m) were included at the time of analysis, and 1565 segments have been operated. Successful fusion was confirmed in 91.3% of all operated levels after 6 months and 92.2% after 12 months. Mean NDI scores improved significantly ( < 0.01) preoperatively (46.3, = 771) to postoperatively (12 months: 25.2, = 281). Consistently, mean VAS neck (preoperative: 64.2, = 770; 12 months: 28.6, = 278), VAS right arm (preoperative: 42.6, = 766; 12 months: 20.4, = 277), and VAS left arm (preoperative: 41.1, = 768; 12 months: 20.8, = 277) decreased significantly ( < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates after surgery with no significant changes in postoperative patient satisfaction between 6 weeks and 12 months (95.1%, = 273).

Conclusions: ACDF with HA-infused PEEK cages demonstrates promising radiographic and clinical outcomes, supporting the potential benefits of incorporating HA into PEEK cages to enhance fusion rates and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates a >90% fusion rate by level with reliable improvements in patient reported outcomes, along with a high rate of patient satisfaction, in a large patient cohort undergoing ACDF with HA-infused PEEK cages.

Level Of Evidence: 2 .

References

Campbell P, Cavanaugh D, Nunley P, Utter P, Kerr E, Wadhwa R . PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49(3):E10. DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367. View

Song K, Choi B . Current concepts of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a review of literature. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(4):531-9. PMC: 4150000. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.531. View

Tan J, Cheong C, Hey H . Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages. Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(5):1285-1295. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w. View

Suess O, Schomaker M, Cabraja M, Danne M, Kombos T, Hanna M . Empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) show slow radiographic fusion that reduces clinical improvement: results from the prospective multicenter "PIERCE-PEEK" study. Patient Saf Surg. 2017; 11:12. PMC: 5410058. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-017-0128-y. View

Clauss M, Van Der Straeten C, Goossens M . Prospective five-year subsidence analysis of a cementless fully hydroxyapatite-coated femoral hip arthroplasty component. Hip Int. 2014; 24(1):91-7. PMC: 6159840. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000082. View

Oshina M, Oshima Y, Tanaka S, Riew K . Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(7):739-750. PMC: 6232720. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218755141. View

Chin K, Gohel N, Aloise D, Seale J, Pandey D, Pencle F . Effectiveness of a Fully Impregnated Hydroxyapatite Polyetheretherketone Cage on Fusion in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery. Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e17457. PMC: 8475745. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17457. View

Mayer F, Heider F, Haasters F, Mehren C . Radiological and Clinical Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with an Innovative 3D Printed Cellular Titanium Cage Filled with Vertebral Bone Marrow. Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:6339910. PMC: 9071886. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6339910. View

Pechlivanis I, Thuring T, Brenke C, Seiz M, Thome C, Barth M . Non-fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of empty polyetheretherketone cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 36(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cbf870. View

10.

Junaid M, Rashid M, Bukhari S, Ahmed M . Radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparing titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages. Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 34(6):1412-1417. PMC: 6290230. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.346.15833. View

11.

Litak J, Czyzewski W, Szymoniuk M, Pastuszak B, Litak J, Litak G . Hydroxyapatite Use in Spine Surgery-Molecular and Clinical Aspect. Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(8). PMC: 9030649. DOI: 10.3390/ma15082906. View

12.

Gupta V, Basantani N, Carvalho A, Gupta E . Long-Term Clinicoradiological Outcomes of Cervical Fusion With Polyether Ether Ketone versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in a Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2022; 16(4):725-731. PMC: 8751538. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_345_20. View

13.

Hu B, Yang X, Hu Y, Lyu Q, Liu L, Zhu C . The n-HA/PA66 Cage Versus the PEEK Cage in Anterior Cervical Fusion with Single-Level Discectomy During 7 Years of Follow-Up. World Neurosurg. 2018; 123:e678-e684. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.251. View

14.

Ramesh N, Moratti S, Dias G . Hydroxyapatite-polymer biocomposites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017; 106(5):2046-2057. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33950. View

15.

Walsh W, Pelletier M, Bertollo N, Christou C, Tan C . Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(11):2364-2372. PMC: 5052200. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4994-x. View

16.

Muthiah N, Yolcu Y, Alan N, Agarwal N, Hamilton D, Ozpinar A . Evolution of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium interbody devices for spinal procedures: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(10):2547-2556. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07272-1. View

17.

Zhu C, He M, Mao L, Yang H, Hu B, Zhang L . Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):918. PMC: 8561990. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04803-7. View

18.

Onyedimma C, Jallow O, Yolcu Y, Alvi M, Goyal A, Ghaith A . Comparison of Outcomes Between Cage Materials Used for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Standalone Cages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 158:e38-e54. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.084. View

19.

BAGBY G . Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics. 1988; 11(6):931-4. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19880601-13. View

20.

Arts M, Torensma B, Wolfs J . Porous titanium cervical interbody fusion device in the treatment of degenerative cervical radiculopathy; 1-year results of a prospective controlled trial. Spine J. 2020; 20(7):1065-1072. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.008. View