Costs of Revision Operations for Distal Junctional Kyphosis Following Thoracic Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Feb 20

PMID 38376560

Authors

Alekos A Theologis

Hao-Hua Wu

Jacob F Oeding

Mohammad Diab

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess direct costs and risks associated with revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK) following thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusions (TPSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: Children who underwent TPSF for AIS by a single surgeon (2014-2020) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion with a lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) cranial to L2. Patients who developed DJK requiring revision operations were identified and compared with those who did not develop DJK.

Results: Seventy-nine children were included for analysis. Of these, 6.3% developed DJK. Average time to revision was 20.8 ± 16.2 months. Comparing index operations, children who developed DJK had significantly greater BMIs, significantly lower thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, greater post-operative lumbar Cobb angles, and significantly more LIVs cranial to the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), despite having statistically similar pre-operative coronal and sagittal alignment parameters and operative details compared with non-DJK patients. Revision operations for DJK, when compared with index operations, involved significantly fewer levels, longer operative times, greater blood loss, and longer hospital lengths of stay. These factors resulted in significantly greater direct costs for revision operations for DJK ($76,883 v. $46,595; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In this single-center experience, risk factors for development of DJK were greater BMI, lower post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and LIV cranial to SSV. As revision operations for DJK were significantly more costly than index operations, all efforts should be aimed at strategies to prevent DJK in the AIS population.

References

Rushton P, Grevitt M . What is the effect of surgery on the quality of life of the adolescent with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A review and statistical analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 38(9):786-94. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182837c95. View

Duri R, Brown K, Johnson M, Mcintosh A . Patients' Perceptions of Breast Asymmetry Improve After Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2018; 7(1):80-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.011. View

Sanders J, Harrast J, Kuklo T, Polly D, Bridwell K, Diab M . The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(24):2719-22. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5959. View

Smucny M, Lubicky J, Sanders J, Carreon L, Diab M . Patient self-assessment of appearance is improved more by all pedicle screw than by hybrid constructs in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(3):248-54. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdb4be. View

Carreon L, Sanders J, Diab M, Sturm P, Sucato D . Patient satisfaction after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(12):965-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92b1d. View

Luhmann S, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Schootman M . Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(20):2191-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a. View

Hamilton D, Smith J, Sansur C, Glassman S, Ames C, Berven S . Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(15):1218-28. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5fd9. View

Richards B, Hasley B, Casey V . Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(26):3018-26. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249553.22138.58. View

Ameri E, Behtash H, Mobini B, Ghandhari H, Tari H, Khakinahad M . The prevalence of distal junctional kyphosis following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Med Iran. 2011; 49(6):357-63. View

10.

Zhang C, Yang S, Wang L, Wang N, Ke Z, Liu P . Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensity Classification Is Associated With Clinical Presentation and Surgical Outcomes in Myelopathy Caused by Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum: A Multicenter Study. Global Spine J. 2021; 13(7):1971-1980. PMC: 10556922. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211067752. View

11.

Segal D, Ball J, Fletcher N, Yoon E, Bastrom T, Vitale M . Risk factors for the development of DJK in AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine Deform. 2021; 10(2):377-385. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00413-4. View

12.

Marciano G, Ball J, Matsumoto H, Roye B, Lenke L, Newton P . Including the stable sagittal vertebra in the fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis reduces the risk of distal junctional kyphosis in Lenke 1-3 B and C curves. Spine Deform. 2021; 9(3):733-741. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00259-2. View

13.

Yang J, Andras L, Broom A, Gonsalves N, Barrett K, Georgiadis A . Preventing Distal Junctional Kyphosis by Applying the Stable Sagittal Vertebra Concept to Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2017; 6(1):38-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.06.007. View

14.

Miller D, Jameel O, Matsumoto H, Hyman J, Schwab F, Roye Jr D . Factors affecting distal end & global decompensation in coronal/sagittal planes 2 years after fusion. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 158:141-6. View

15.

Levine D, Dugas J, Tarantino S . Chance fracture after pedicle screw fixation. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(3):382-5; discussion 386. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00019. View

16.

Floccari L, Su A, McIntosh A, Rathjen K, Shaughnessy W, Larson A . Distal Junctional Failure Following Pediatric Spinal Fusion. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39(4):202-208. PMC: 5797518. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000898. View

17.

Hosthota A, Govindasamy R, Rudrappa S . Distal Junctional Failure Secondary to Nontraumatic Fracture of Lower Instrumented Vertebra: Our Experience and Review of Literature. Int J Spine Surg. 2021; 15(5):1031-1038. PMC: 8651202. DOI: 10.14444/8131. View

18.

Segal D, Orland K, Yoon E, Bastrom T, Fletcher N . Fusions ending above the sagittal stable vertebrae in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does it matter?. Spine Deform. 2020; 8(5):983-989. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00118-0. View

19.

Li Y, Bai H, Liu C, Zhao Y, Feng Y, Li T . Distal Adding-On Phenomenon in Lenke IA and Lenke IIA: Risk Analysis and Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra. World Neurosurg. 2019; 136:e171-e180. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.087. View

20.

Cho K, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Kamiya M, Sides B . Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(8):765-70. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e28ed. View