» Articles » PMID: 38374411

Usefulness of Pituitary High-resolution 3D MRI with Deep-learning-based Reconstruction for Perioperative Evaluation of Pituitary Adenomas

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of T1-weighted 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions on contrast-enhanced MRI.

Methods: We evaluated 24 patients with pituitary adenoma or residual tumor using CUBE with and without DLR, 1-mm slice thickness 2D T1WI (1-mm 2D T1WI) with DLR, and 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR) as contrast-enhanced MRI. Depiction scores of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions were assigned by two neuroradiologists, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated.

Results: CUBE with DLR showed significantly higher scores for depicting pituitary adenoma or residual tumor compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR, and SPGR (p < 0.01). The depiction score for delineation of the boundary between adenoma and the cavernous sinus was higher for CUBE with DLR than for 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR (p = 0.01), but the difference was not significant when compared to SPGR (p = 0.20). CUBE with DLR had better interobserver agreement for evaluating adenomas than 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR (Kappa values, 0.75 vs. 0.41). The CNR of the adenoma to the brain parenchyma increased to a ratio of 3.6 (obtained by dividing 13.7, CNR of CUBE with DLR, by 3.8, that without DLR, p < 0.01). CUBE with DLR had a significantly higher CNR than SPGR, but not 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR.

Conclusion: On the contrast-enhanced MRI, compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR and SPGR, CUBE with DLR improves the depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Image Quality and Scan Time Efficiency in Accelerated 3D T1-Weighted Pediatric Brain MRI Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction.

Yoo H, Moon H, Kim S, Kim D, Choi Y, Cheon J Korean J Radiol. 2025; 26(2):180-192.

PMID: 39898398 PMC: 11794287. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0701.

References
1.
Dickerman R, Oldfield E . Basis of persistent and recurrent Cushing disease: an analysis of findings at repeated pituitary surgery. J Neurosurg. 2003; 97(6):1343-9. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.6.1343. View

2.
Katznelson L, Laws Jr E, Melmed S, Molitch M, Murad M, Utz A . Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(11):3933-51. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-2700. View

3.
Salenave S, Gatta B, Pecheur S, San-Galli F, Visot A, Lasjaunias P . Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings do not influence surgical outcome in adrenocorticotropin-secreting microadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89(7):3371-6. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-031908. View

4.
Ogura A, Maeda F, Miyai A, Kikumoto R . [Effects of slice thickness and matrix size on MRI for signal detection]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2005; 61(8):1140-3. DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00003943075. View

5.
Chartrand G, Cheng P, Vorontsov E, Drozdzal M, Turcotte S, Pal C . Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics. 2017; 37(7):2113-2131. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017170077. View