Comparing Outcomes of Plate Augmentation, Nail Exchange, and Nail Exchange with Plate Augmentation in the Treatment of Atrophic Femoral Shaft Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2024 Feb 19

PMID 38372763

Authors

Incheol Kook

Chang-Wug Oh

Oog-Jin Shon

Joon-Woo Kim

Ji-Wan Kim

Kyu Tae Hwang

Ki-Chul Park

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation.

Results: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique.

Conclusions: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Citing Articles

Comparative Study of Exchange Nailing and Augmentative Plating for Treating Aseptic Nonunion of Femoral Shafts Post Intramedullary Nailing: A Single-Blind, Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial.

Motififard M, Mousavi H, Iranpanah N, Akbari Aghdam H, Teimouri M, Aliakbari M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598072 PMC: 11594341. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226928.

References

Ricci W, Gallagher B, Haidukewych G . Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17(5):296-305. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200905000-00004. View

Ricci W, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, Dipasquale T, Sanders R . Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(3):161-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200103000-00003. View

Wolinsky P, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K . Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases. J Trauma. 1999; 46(3):392-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199903000-00007. View

Garnavos C . Treatment of aseptic non-union after intramedullary nailing without removal of the nail. Injury. 2017; 48 Suppl 1:S76-S81. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.022. View

Park K, Kim K, Choi Y . Comparison of mechanical rigidity between plate augmentation leaving the nail in situ and interlocking nail using cadaveric fracture model of the femur. Int Orthop. 2010; 35(4):581-5. PMC: 3066311. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-0983-y. View

Vaishya R, Agarwal A, Gupta N, Vijay V . Plate augmentation with retention of intramedullary nail is effective for resistant femoral shaft non-union. J Orthop. 2016; 13(4):242-5. PMC: 4925908. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.003. View

Hak D, Lee S, Goulet J . Success of exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft nonunion or delayed union. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(3):178-82. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200003000-00005. View

Bellabarba C, Ricci W, Bolhofner B . Results of indirect reduction and plating of femoral shaft nonunions after intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(4):254-63. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200105000-00004. View

Lai P, Hsu Y, Chou Y, Yeh W, Ueng S, Yu Y . Augmentative antirotational plating provided a significantly higher union rate than exchanging reamed nailing in treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion - retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):127. PMC: 6434807. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2514-3. View

10.

Cimen O, Oner A, Koksal A, Dirvar F, Mert M, Kargin D . A comparison of exchange nailing and plate augmentation over a retained intramedullary nail in aseptic oligotrophic and atrophic femoral shaft pseudoarthrosis. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023; 34(1):121-129. PMC: 9903120. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.788. View

11.

Wittauer M, Burch M, McNally M, Vandendriessche T, Clauss M, Della Rocca G . Definition of long-bone nonunion: A scoping review of prospective clinical trials to evaluate current practice. Injury. 2021; 52(11):3200-3205. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.008. View

12.

Govaert G, Kuehl R, Atkins B, Trampuz A, Morgenstern M, Obremskey W . Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 34(1):8-17. PMC: 6903359. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001614. View

13.

Gustilo R, Mendoza R, Williams D . Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984; 24(8):742-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198408000-00009. View

14.

Ru J, Chen L, Hu F, Shi D, Xu R, Du J . Factors associated with development of re-nonunion after primary revision in femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13(1):180. PMC: 6054735. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0886-y. View

15.

Cone R, Roszman A, Conway Y, Cichos K, McGwin G, Spitler C . Risk Factors for Nonunion of Distal Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2023; 37(4):175-180. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002553. View

16.

Greksa F, Toth K, Boros M, Szabo A . Periosteal microvascular reorganization after tibial reaming and intramedullary nailing in rats. J Orthop Sci. 2012; 17(4):477-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0222-z. View

17.

Clark D, Nakamura M, Miclau T, Marcucio R . Effects of Aging on Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017; 15(6):601-608. PMC: 6517062. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-017-0413-9. View

18.

Jhunjhunwala H, Dhawale A . Is augmentation plating an effective treatment for non-union of femoral shaft fractures with nail in situ?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 42(3):339-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0534-8. View

19.

Jones C, Mayo K . Nonunion treatment: iliac crest bone graft techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 19(10 Suppl):S11-3. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200511101-00004. View

20.

Grundnes O, Reikeras O . Effects of instability on bone healing. Femoral osteotomies studied in rats. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 64(1):55-8. DOI: 10.3109/17453679308994529. View