Differing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Farmers and Intermediaries: Insights into the Ecuadorian Cocoa Value Chain

Overview

Journal Agric Food Econ

Publisher Springer Nature

Date 2024 Feb 19

PMID 38371698

Authors

Guillermo Zambrano

Lina M Tennhardt

Moritz Egger

Karen Ramirez

Adriana Santos

Byron Moyano

Michael Curran

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic generated diverse impacts and responses in agricultural value chains worldwide. Cocoa is a key crop for Ecuadorian exports, and the analysis of effects the pandemic had on value chain actors contributes to the understanding of their individual capacities to coping with a major shock. The purpose of this study was to assess the number and severity of impacts and responses implemented by two links in the cocoa value chain to the pandemic, based on a survey of 158 cocoa farmers and 52 cocoa intermediaries from the main cocoa-producing provinces of the northern coast of Ecuador in 2021. Surveyed farmers and part of the intermediaries form part of the sustainability program of a large Swiss chocolate manufacturer. The impacts and responses reported were grouped into seven resources according to the Activity System Approach. Then, a comparison between groups was applied using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for nonparametric data, determining the most severe impacts and effective resilience responses among the actors. The results reveal that farmers and intermediaries were similarly affected by the pandemic, reporting 21 and 16 negative impacts, respectively. Farmers experienced a higher number and severity of impacts on financial and social resources, while intermediaries on human and material resources. The strongest impact was the loss of sales, reported by 65% of farmers and 58% of intermediaries. Farmers implemented more social responses that they judged highly effective, while intermediaries implemented more human responses that they judged highly effective. Public policy should enhance the social resources of farmers by strengthening their associativity and the capacities of their members, as mechanisms to mitigate their vulnerability to future health and climate crises. The financial resources of both actors should be protected through public credit and agricultural insurance.

References

Bene C . Resilience of local food systems and links to food security - A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks. Food Secur. 2020; 12(4):805-822. PMC: 7351643. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01076-1. View

Dixon J, Weerahewa J, Hellin J, Rola-Rubzen M, Huang J, Kumar S . Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems. Agric Syst. 2022; 193:103168. PMC: 9584831. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103168. View

Bene C, Bakker D, Chavarro M, Even B, Melo J, Sonneveld A . Global assessment of the impacts of COVID-19 on food security. Glob Food Sec. 2021; 31:100575. PMC: 8426216. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100575. View

Alava J, Guevara A . A critical narrative of Ecuador's preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021; 2:100127. PMC: 8062908. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100127. View

Lopez-Ridaura S, Sanders A, Barba-Escoto L, Wiegel J, Mayorga-Cortes M, Gonzalez-Esquivel C . Immediate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on farming systems in Central America and Mexico. Agric Syst. 2022; 192:103178. PMC: 9759656. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103178. View

Kumareswaran K, Jayasinghe G . Systematic review on ensuring the global food security and covid-19 pandemic resilient food systems: towards accomplishing sustainable development goals targets. Discov Sustain. 2022; 3(1):29. PMC: 9561052. DOI: 10.1007/s43621-022-00096-5. View

Arita S, Grant J, Sydow S, Beckman J . Has global agricultural trade been resilient under coronavirus (COVID-19)? Findings from an econometric assessment of 2020. Food Policy. 2021; 107:102204. PMC: 8654290. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102204. View

Tian X, Zhou Y, Wang H . The Impact of COVID-19 on Food Consumption and Dietary Quality of Rural Households in China. Foods. 2022; 11(4). PMC: 8870752. DOI: 10.3390/foods11040510. View

Angaw K . Policy Responses and Social Solidarity Imperatives to Respond the COVID-19 Pandemic Socioeconomic Crises in Ethiopia. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021; 13:279-287. PMC: 8076721. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S300695. View

10.

Darnhofer I . Farm resilience in the face of the unexpected: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Agric Human Values. 2020; 37(3):605-606. PMC: 7224090. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10053-5. View

11.

Workie E, Mackolil J, Nyika J, Ramadas S . Deciphering the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food security, agriculture, and livelihoods: A review of the evidence from developing countries. Curr Res Environ Sustain. 2022; 2:100014. PMC: 7550095. DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100014. View

12.

Tittonell P, Fernandez M, El Mujtar V, Preiss P, Sarapura S, Laborda L . Emerging responses to the COVID-19 crisis from family farming and the agroecology movement in Latin America - A rediscovery of food, farmers and collective action. Agric Syst. 2022; 190:103098. PMC: 9759627. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103098. View

13.

Hammond J, Siegal K, Milner D, Elimu E, Vail T, Cathala P . Perceived effects of COVID-19 restrictions on smallholder farmers: Evidence from seven lower- and middle-income countries. Agric Syst. 2022; 198:103367. PMC: 8801256. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103367. View

14.

Cadby J . Can COVID-19 Melt the Craft Chocolate Industry?. Food Ethics. 2021; 6(2):8. PMC: 8076874. DOI: 10.1007/s41055-021-00087-8. View

15.

Guedegbe T, Adelaja A, George J . Resilience, endogenous policy responses to COVID-19, and their impacts on farm performance. World Dev. 2023; 168:106254. PMC: 10076512. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106254. View

16.

Stephens E, Timsina J, Martin G, van Wijk M, Klerkx L, Reidsma P . The immediate impact of the first waves of the global COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural systems worldwide: Reflections on the COVID-19 special issue for agricultural systems. Agric Syst. 2022; 201:103436. PMC: 9149207. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103436. View

17.

Bista R, Parajuli R, Giri K, Karki R, Song C . Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the livelihoods of rural households in the community forestry landscape in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Trees For People. 2022; 9:100312. PMC: 9352415. DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100312. View

18.

Manda S . Inside Zambia's 'new normal:' COVID-19 policy responses and implications for peri-urban food security and livelihoods. J Int Dev. 2023; . PMC: 9878058. DOI: 10.1002/jid.3720. View

19.

Kumar S, Jolly A . Consequences of COVID-19 pandemic on global maritime trade industry. Int Marit Health. 2021; 72(1):82-83. DOI: 10.5603/IMH.2021.0014. View

20.

Roubik H, Lostak M, Ketuama C, Prochazka P, Soukupova J, Hakl J . Current coronavirus crisis and past pandemics - What can happen in post-COVID-19 agriculture?. Sustain Prod Consum. 2022; 30:752-760. PMC: 8759803. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.007. View