» Articles » PMID: 38371461

Cognitive Outcomes in Patients with Essential Tremor Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Feb 19
PMID 38371461
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurological disease. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) or the adjacent structures, such as caudal zona incerta/ posterior subthalamic area (cZi/PSA), can be effective in treating medication refractory tremor. However, it is not clear whether DBS can cause cognitive changes, in which domain, and to what extent if so.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and the Web of Science for available publications reporting on cognitive outcomes in patients with ET who underwent DBS following the PICO (population, intervention, comparators, and outcomes) concept. The PRISMA guideline for systematic reviews was applied.

Results: Twenty relevant articles were finally identified and included for review, thirteen of which were prospective (one also randomized) studies and seven were retrospective. Cognitive outcomes included attention, memory, executive function, language, visuospatial function, and mood-related variables. VIM and cZi/PSA DBS were generally well tolerated, although verbal fluency and language production were affected in some patients. Additionally, left-sided VIM DBS was associated with negative effects on verbal abstraction, word recall, and verbal memory performance in some patients.

Conclusion: Significant cognitive decline after VIM or cZi/PSA DBS in ET patients appears to be rare. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to meticulously study the effect of the location, laterality, and stimulation parameters of the active contacts on cognitive outcomes while considering possible medication change post-DBS, timing, standard neuropsychological battery, practice effects, the timing of assessment, and effect size as potential confounders.

Citing Articles

Identification of a metabolic brain network characterizing essential tremor.

Volnov S, Baagil H, Winz O, Kaiser H, Meles S, Schulz J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2138.

PMID: 39820101 PMC: 11739557. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82069-4.

References
1.
Wang D, Jorge A, Lipski W, Kratter I, Henry L, Richardson R . Lateralized Effect of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Location on Verbal Abstraction. Mov Disord. 2021; 36(8):1843-1852. DOI: 10.1002/mds.28606. View

2.
Al-Fatly B, Ewert S, Kubler D, Kroneberg D, Horn A, Kuhn A . Connectivity profile of thalamic deep brain stimulation to effectively treat essential tremor. Brain. 2019; 142(10):3086-3098. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz236. View

3.
Barbe M, Liebhart L, Runge M, Deyng J, Florin E, Wojtecki L . Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus in patients with essential tremor: stimulation below intercommissural line is more efficient but equally effective as stimulation above. Exp Neurol. 2011; 230(1):131-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.04.005. View

4.
Jones J, Orozco T, Bowers D, Hu W, Jabarkheel Z, Chiu S . Cognitive Outcomes for Essential Tremor Patients Selected for Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Through Interdisciplinary Evaluations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:578348. PMC: 7759538. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.578348. View

5.
Cernera S, Okun M, Gunduz A . A Review of Cognitive Outcomes Across Movement Disorder Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:419. PMC: 6514131. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00419. View