» Articles » PMID: 38366391

Reporting of Morphology, Location, and Size in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in 11,785 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Cartilage
Date 2024 Feb 17
PMID 38366391
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Uniformity of reporting is a requisite to be able to compare results of clinical studies on the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and quality of reporting of size, morphology, and location of OLTs.

Design: A literature search was performed from 1996 to 2023 to identify clinical studies on surgical treatment of OLTs. Screening was performed by 2 reviewers, who subsequently graded the quality using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). The primary outcome was the frequency and qualitative assessment of reporting of size, morphology, and location.

Results: Of 3,074 articles, 262 articles were included. This comprised a total of 11,785 patients. Size was reported in 248 (95%) of the articles and was described with a measure for surface area in 83%, however, in 56%, definition of measurement is unknown. Intraclass coefficient (ICC) value for the reliability of size measurement was 0.94 for computed tomography (CT) scan and 0.87 for MRI scan. Morphology was reported in 172 (66%) of the articles and using a classification system in 23% of the studies. Location was reported in 220 (84%) of the studies.

Conclusion: No consensus was found on the reporting of morphology, with non-validated classification systems and different terminologies used. For location, reporting in 9 zones is underreported. Size was well reported and measurements are more reliable for CT compared with MRI. As these prognostic factors guide clinical decision-making, we advocate the development of a standardized and validated OLT classification to reach uniform reporting in literature.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Citing Articles

Single-Stage All-Arthroscopic Autologous Cancellous Bone Transplantation in Treatment of Cystic Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus.

Hu F, Yang S, Shi W, Liu Z, Guo Q Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 14(2):103208.

PMID: 40041332 PMC: 11873451. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103208.

References
1.
Dahmen J, Jaddi S, Hagemeijer N, Lubberts B, Sierevelt I, Stufkens S . Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cartilage. 2022; 13(2):19476035221102569. PMC: 9168886. DOI: 10.1177/19476035221102569. View

2.
Reilingh M, Murawski C, DiGiovanni C, Dahmen J, Ferrao P, Lambers K . Fixation Techniques: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39(1_suppl):23S-27S. DOI: 10.1177/1071100718781096. View

3.
Becher C, Zuhlke D, Plaas C, Ewig M, Calliess T, Stukenborg-Colsman C . T2-mapping at 3 T after microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus at an average follow-up of 8 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(8):2406-2412. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2913-9. View

4.
Chien P, Khan K, Siassakos D . Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO. BJOG. 2012; 119(8):903-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03242.x. View

5.
Li H, Hua Y, Li H, Li S, Ma K, Chen S . Treatment of talus osteochondral defects in chronic lateral unstable ankles: small-sized lateral chondral lesions had good clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(7):2116-2122. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4591-x. View