Validated WGS and WES Protocols Proved Saliva-derived GDNA As an Equivalent to Blood-derived GDNA for Clinical and Population Genomic Analyses

Overview

Journal BMC Genomics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2024 Feb 16

PMID 38365587

Authors

Katerina Kvapilova

Pavol Misenko

Jan Radvanszky

Ondrej Brzon

Jaroslav Budis

Juraj Gazdarica

Ondrej Pos

Marie Korabecna

Martin Kasny

Tomas Szemes

Petr Kvapil

Jan Paces

Zbynek Kozmik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have become standard methods in human clinical diagnostics as well as in population genomics (POPGEN). Blood-derived genomic DNA (gDNA) is routinely used in the clinical environment. Conversely, many POPGEN studies and commercial tests benefit from easy saliva sampling. Here, we evaluated the quality of variant call sets and the level of genotype concordance of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) for WES and WGS using paired blood- and saliva-derived gDNA isolates employing genomic reference-based validated protocols.

Methods: The genomic reference standard Coriell NA12878 was repeatedly analyzed using optimized WES and WGS protocols, and data calls were compared with the truth dataset published by the Genome in a Bottle Consortium. gDNA was extracted from the paired blood and saliva samples of 10 participants and processed using the same protocols. A comparison of paired blood-saliva call sets was performed in the context of WGS and WES genomic reference-based technical validation results.

Results: The quality pattern of called variants obtained from genomic-reference-based technical replicates correlates with data calls of paired blood-saliva-derived samples in all levels of tested examinations despite a higher rate of non-human contamination found in the saliva samples. The F1 score of 10 blood-to-saliva-derived comparisons ranged between 0.8030-0.9998 for SNVs and between 0.8883-0.9991 for small-indels in the case of the WGS protocol, and between 0.8643-0.999 for SNVs and between 0.7781-1.000 for small-indels in the case of the WES protocol.

Conclusion: Saliva may be considered an equivalent material to blood for genetic analysis for both WGS and WES under strict protocol conditions. The accuracy of sequencing metrics and variant-detection accuracy is not affected by choosing saliva as the gDNA source instead of blood but much more significantly by the genomic context, variant types, and the sequencing technology used.

Citing Articles

GWAS advancements to investigate disease associations and biological mechanisms.

Omidiran O, Patel A, Usman S, Mhatre I, Abdelhalim H, DeGroat W Clin Transl Discov. 2024; 4(3).

PMID: 38737752 PMC: 11086745. DOI: 10.1002/ctd2.296.

References

Zare F, Ansari S, Najarian K, Nabavi S . Preprocessing Sequence Coverage Data for More Precise Detection of Copy Number Variations. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018; 17(3):868-876. PMC: 7278033. DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2869738. View

Fan S, Spence J, Feng Y, Hansen M, Terhorst J, Beltrame M . Whole-genome sequencing reveals a complex African population demographic history and signatures of local adaptation. Cell. 2023; 186(5):923-939.e14. PMC: 10568978. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.042. View

Bick D, Jones M, Taylor S, Taft R, Belmont J . Case for genome sequencing in infants and children with rare, undiagnosed or genetic diseases. J Med Genet. 2019; 56(12):783-791. PMC: 6929710. DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106111. View

Lee H, Chi C, Tsai C . Diagnostic yield and treatment impact of whole-genome sequencing in paediatric neurological disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020; 63(8):934-938. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14722. View

Kumar A, Skrahina V, Atta J, Boettcher V, Hanig N, Rolfs A . Microbial contamination and composition of oral samples subjected to clinical whole genome sequencing. Front Genet. 2023; 14:1081424. PMC: 9941560. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1081424. View

Senel S . An Overview of Physical, Microbiological and Immune Barriers of Oral Mucosa. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(15). PMC: 8346143. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22157821. View

Sherkow J, Park J, Lu C . Regulating Direct-to-Consumer Polygenic Risk Scores. JAMA. 2023; 330(8):691-692. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.12262. View

Zook J, McDaniel J, Olson N, Wagner J, Parikh H, Heaton H . An open resource for accurately benchmarking small variant and reference calls. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37(5):561-566. PMC: 6500473. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0074-6. View

Olomu I, Pena-Cortes L, Long R, Vyas A, Krichevskiy O, Luellwitz R . Elimination of "kitome" and "splashome" contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome. BMC Microbiol. 2020; 20(1):157. PMC: 7291729. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01839-y. View

10.

Bruinsma F, Joo J, Wong E, Giles G, Southey M . The utility of DNA extracted from saliva for genome-wide molecular research platforms. BMC Res Notes. 2018; 11(1):8. PMC: 5759806. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-3110-y. View

11.

Smedley D, Smith K, Martin A, Thomas E, McDonagh E, Cipriani V . 100,000 Genomes Pilot on Rare-Disease Diagnosis in Health Care - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(20):1868-1880. PMC: 7613219. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035790. View

12.

Samson C, Whitford W, Snell R, Jacobsen J, Lehnert K . Contaminating DNA in human saliva alters the detection of variants from whole genome sequencing. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):19255. PMC: 7648094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76022-4. View

13.

Souche E, Beltran S, Brosens E, Belmont J, Fossum M, Riess O . Recommendations for whole genome sequencing in diagnostics for rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(9):1017-1021. PMC: 9437083. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01113-x. View

14.

Theda C, Hwang S, Czajko A, Loke Y, Leong P, Craig J . Quantitation of the cellular content of saliva and buccal swab samples. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):6944. PMC: 5932057. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25311-0. View

15.

Lee E, Sung J, Kim H, Kim H . Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Age-Specific Changes in the Human Blood Microbiota. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(6). PMC: 9225573. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060939. View

16.

Owen M, Wright M, Batalov S, Kwon Y, Ding Y, Chau K . Reclassification of the Etiology of Infant Mortality With Whole-Genome Sequencing. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(2):e2254069. PMC: 9912130. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54069. View

17.

Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J . fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34(17):i884-i890. PMC: 6129281. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. View

18.

Harris C, Millman K, van der Walt S, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D . Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825):357-362. PMC: 7759461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. View

19.

Poehls U, Hack C, Ekici A, Beckmann M, Fasching P, Ruebner M . Saliva samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping: an acceptable and sufficient means in improvement of risk estimation throughout mammographic diagnostics. Eur J Med Res. 2018; 23(1):20. PMC: 5921411. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-018-0318-9. View

20.

Castillo D, Rifkin R, Cowan D, Potgieter M . The Healthy Human Blood Microbiome: Fact or Fiction?. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019; 9:148. PMC: 6519389. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00148. View