Using Case Vignettes to Study the Presence of Outcome, Hindsight, and Implicit Bias in Acute Unplanned Medical Care: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal Eur J Emerg Med

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2024 Feb 16

PMID 38364049

Authors

Patricia Plaum

Laura N Visser

Bas de Groot

Marlies E B Morsink

Wilma L J M Duijst

Bart G J Candel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Importance: Various biases can impact decision-making and judgment of case quality in the Emergency Department (ED). Outcome and hindsight bias can lead to wrong retrospective judgment of care quality, and implicit bias can result in unjust treatment differences in the ED based on irrelevant patient characteristics.

Objectives: First, to evaluate the extent to which knowledge of an outcome influences physicians' quality of care assessment. Secondly, to examine whether patients with functional disorders receive different treatment compared to patients with a somatic past medical history.

Design: A web-based cross-sectional study in which physicians received case vignettes with a case description and care provided. Physicians were informed about vignette outcomes in a randomized way (no, good, or bad outcome). Physicians rated quality of care for four case vignettes with different outcomes. Subsequently, they received two more case vignettes. Physicians were informed about the past medical history of the patient in a randomized way (somatic or functional). Physicians made treatment and diagnostic decisions for both cases.

Setting And Participants: One hundred ninety-one Dutch emergency physicians (EPs) and general practitioners (GPs) participated.

Outcome Measures And Analysis: Quality of care was rated on a Likert scale (0-5) and dichotomized as adequate (yes/no). Physicians estimated the likelihood of patients experiencing a bad outcome for hindsight bias. For the second objective, physicians decided on prescribing analgesics and additional diagnostic tests.

Main Results: Large differences existed in rated quality of care for three out of four vignettes based on different case outcomes. For example, physicians rated the quality of care as adequate in 44% (95% CI 33-57%) for an abdominal pain case with a bad outcome, compared to 88% (95% CI 78-94%) for a good outcome, and 84% (95% CI 73-91%) for no outcome ( P < 0.01). The estimated likelihood of a bad outcome was higher if physicians received a vignette with a bad patient outcome. Fewer diagnostic tests were performed and fewer opioids were prescribed for patients with a functional disorder.

Conclusion: Outcome, hindsight, and implicit bias significantly influence decision-making and care quality assessment by Dutch EPs and GPs.

References

Petty T, Stephenson L, Campbell P, Stephenson T . Outcome Bias in Clinical Negligence Medico-legal Cases. J Law Med. 2019; 26(4):825-830. View

Blumenthal-Barby J, Krieger H . Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Making. 2014; 35(4):539-57. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. View

Sukhera J, Watling C . A Framework for Integrating Implicit Bias Recognition Into Health Professions Education. Acad Med. 2017; 93(1):35-40. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001819. View

Verhagen M, de Vos M, Sujan M, Hamming J . The problem with making Safety-II work in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022; 31(5):402-408. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014396. View

Berlin L . Outcome bias. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183(3):557-60. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.3.1830557. View

Grafeneder J, Baewert A, Katz H, Holzinger A, Niederdoeckl J, Roth D . Immigration bias among medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2023; 30(6):417-423. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001057. View

Devine P, Forscher P, Austin A, Cox W . Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013; 48(6):1267-1278. PMC: 3603687. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003. View

Croskerry P, Sinclair D . Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error?. CJEM. 2007; 3(4):271-6. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500005765. View

Asbring P . Chronic illness -- a disruption in life: identity-transformation among women with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 34(3):312-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01767.x. View

10.

Smaggus A . Safety-I, Safety-II and burnout: how complexity science can help clinician wellness. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019; 28(8):667-671. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009147. View

11.

Freund Y, Goulet H, Leblanc J, Bokobza J, Ray P, Maignan M . Effect of Systematic Physician Cross-checking on Reducing Adverse Events in the Emergency Department: The CHARMED Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(6):812-819. PMC: 6145759. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0607. View

12.

Chen E, Shofer F, Dean A, Hollander J, Baxt W, Robey J . Gender disparity in analgesic treatment of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15(5):414-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00100.x. View

13.

Banham-Hall E, Stevens S . Hindsight bias critically impacts on clinicians' assessment of care quality in retrospective case note review. Clin Med (Lond). 2019; 19(1):16-21. PMC: 6399623. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-1-16. View

14.

Christensen C, Heckerling P, Mackesy M, BERNSTEIN L, Elstein A . Framing bias among expert and novice physicians. Acad Med. 1991; 66(9 Suppl):S76-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199109000-00047. View

15.

Zhang L, Reynolds Losin E, Ashar Y, Koban L, Wager T . Gender Biases in Estimation of Others' Pain. J Pain. 2021; 22(9):1048-1059. PMC: 8827218. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001. View

16.

Coisy F, Olivier G, Ageron F, Guillermou H, Roussel M, Balen F . Do emergency medicine health care workers rate triage level of chest pain differently based upon appearance in simulated patients?. Eur J Emerg Med. 2023; 31(3):188-194. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001113. View

17.

FitzGerald C, Hurst S . Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017; 18(1):19. PMC: 5333436. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8. View

18.

Norman G, Monteiro S, Sherbino J, Ilgen J, Schmidt H, Mamede S . The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking. Acad Med. 2016; 92(1):23-30. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421. View

19.

Gupta M, Schriger D, Tabas J . The presence of outcome bias in emergency physician retrospective judgments of the quality of care. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57(4):323-328.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.10.004. View

20.

Kool M, van Middendorp H, Boeije H, Geenen R . Understanding the lack of understanding: invalidation from the perspective of the patient with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61(12):1650-6. DOI: 10.1002/art.24922. View