» Articles » PMID: 38363919

Efficacy of Adjuvant-associated COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 16
PMID 38363919
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adjuvants may enhance the efficacy of vaccines. however, the efficacy of adjuvant-associated COVID-19 vaccines (ACVs) remains unclear since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to address this gap by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ACVs against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 CoV (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the vaccine efficacy (VE) of ACVs against VOC (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, or Omicron), up to May 27, 2023. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to assess VE with 95% confidence intervals (CI) through meta-analysis. Cochrane Risk of Bias tools were used to assess the risk of bias in RCTs.

Results: Eight RCTs with 113,202 participants were included in the analysis, which incorporated 4 ACVs [Matrix-M (NVX-CoV2373), Alum (BBV152), CpG-1018/Alum (SCB-2019), and AS03 (CoVLP]). The pooled efficacy of full vaccination with ACVs against VOC was 88.0% (95% CI: 83.0-91.5). Full vaccination was effective against Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Gamma variants, with VE values of 93.66% (95% CI: 86.5-100.74), 64.70% (95% CI: 41.87-87.54), 75.95% (95% CI: 67.9-83.99), and 91.26% (95% CI: 84.35-98.17), respectively. Currently, there is a lack of RCT evidence regarding the efficacy of ACVs against the Omicron variant.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, it should be that full vaccination with ACVs has high efficacy against Alpha or Gamma variants and moderate efficacy against Beta and Delta variants. Notably, with the exception of the aluminum-adjuvanted vaccine, the other ACVs had moderate to high efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 variant. This raises concerns about the effectiveness of ACVs booster vaccinations against Omicron.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Vaccines for COVID-19: An Umbrella Review.

SeyedAlinaghi S, Pashapouryeganeh A, Dehghani S, Mirzapour P, Abbaspour F, Afroughi F Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024; 13(1):e6.

PMID: 39318867 PMC: 11417638. DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2357.

References
1.
Ella R, Reddy S, Blackwelder W, Potdar V, Yadav P, Sarangi V . Efficacy, safety, and lot-to-lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): interim results of a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10317):2173-2184. PMC: 8584828. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02000-6. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2011; 3(3):e123-30. PMC: 3090117. View

3.
Heath P, Galiza E, Baxter D, Boffito M, Browne D, Burns F . Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(13):1172-1183. PMC: 8262625. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107659. View

4.
Veneti L, Berild J, Watle S, Starrfelt J, Greve-Isdahl M, Langlete P . Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron infection in adolescents, Norway, August 2021 to January 2022. Int J Infect Dis. 2023; 130:182-188. PMC: 9991321. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.03.004. View

5.
Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View