» Articles » PMID: 38359002

Dietary Intake is Associated with the Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyoma in Korean Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Feb 15
PMID 38359002
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Uterine leiomyoma (UL), the most prevalent benign gynecologic tumor among reproductive-aged women, lacks sufficient research on the potential association between dietary intake and its occurrence in Korean women. Addressing this research gap, this study aims to evaluate the potential link between dietary intake and the prevalence of UL in Korean women.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a cohort of 672 women, aged 23 to 73, were enrolled, with 383 (57%) being premenopausal. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and UL presence was determined through ultrasonography. The analysis focused exclusively on items within ten categories, including vegetables/fruit, vegetables, fruits, red meat, processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy product, milk, and alcohol. Multiple logistic regression models were employed to explore the relationship between dietary intake and the prevalence of UL, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while adjusting for confounding factors.

Results: Within the total cohort, 220 (32.7%) women were diagnosed with UL. High intakes of fish and poultry showed an association with higher UL prevalence. Odds ratios (95% CIs) for the upper quartiles compared to the lower quartiles were 1.68 (1.01-2.81; p trend = 0.05) for fish intake and 1.87 (1.11-3.17; p trend = 0.06) for poultry intake. Conversely, an inverse relationship emerged between dairy product intake and UL prevalence, with an odds ratio of 0.58 (95% CI 0.35-0.96; p trend = 0.05). Stratifying the analysis by menopausal status revealed a parallel pattern, with heightened UL prevalence with fish intake and reduced prevalence with dairy product intake. However, the link between poultry intake and UL prevalence was primarily observed among postmenopausal women. Among premenopausal women, elevated vegetable intake was linked to a decreased UL prevalence (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.97 for top vs. bottom quartiles; p trend = 0.01).

Conclusion: We found that high consumption of fish and poultry, coupled with low intake of dairy products, correlated with an elevated prevalence of UL. Furthermore, vegetable intake exhibited an inverse relationship with UL prevalence, particularly among premenopausal women.

Citing Articles

The Association Between Physical Activity and Uterine Leiomyoma and Its Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Birolim M, Souza S, Rodrigues R, da Silva D, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Mesas A Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70487.

PMID: 39995801 PMC: 11847712. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70487.

References
1.
Bradbury K, Appleby P, Key T . Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr. 2014; 100 Suppl 1:394S-8S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071357. View

2.
Alberti K, Eckel R, Grundy S, Zimmet P, Cleeman J, Donato K . Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation;.... Circulation. 2009; 120(16):1640-5. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. View

3.
He Y, Zeng Q, Dong S, Qin L, Li G, Wang P . Associations between uterine fibroids and lifestyles including diet, physical activity and stress: a case-control study in China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013; 22(1):109-17. DOI: 10.6133/apjcn.2013.22.1.07. View

4.
Shen Y, Wu Y, Lu Q, Ren M . Vegetarian diet and reduced uterine fibroids risk: A case-control study in Nanjing, China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015; 42(1):87-94. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12834. View

5.
Baird D, Dunson D, Hill M, Cousins D, Schectman J . High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188(1):100-7. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.99. View