» Articles » PMID: 38358434

Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation for Fertility Preservation Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: Safety, Ovarian Function Follow-up, and Results of Ovarian Tissue Transplantation

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the experience of performing ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), among girls/women with severe sickle cell disease (SCD)(SS or S/β-thalassemia) who are, besides the usual surgical risk, at risk of SCD-related complications during the fertility preservation procedure for improving their counseling and management.

Methods: This retrospective study included 75 patients (girls/women) with SCD who have had OTC before myeloablative conditioning regimen (MAC) for HSCT. Characteristics of patients and data on OTC, ovarian status follow-up, and results of ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) were collected in medical records.

Results: At OTC, the median (IQR 25-75; range) age of the patients was 9.6 (6.9-14.1; 3.6-28.3) years, 56/75 were prepubertal, and no SCD or surgery-related complications occurred. The median follow-up post-HSCT was > 9 years. At the last follow-up, among prepubertal patients at HSCT, 26/56 were ≥ 15 years old and presented with a premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), except 2, including the patient who had received an OTT to induce puberty. Eight were 13-15 years old and presented for POI. The remaining 22 patients were under 13. Among the 19 patients who were menarche at HSCT, 2 died 6 months post-HSCT and we do not have ovarian function follow-up for the other 2 patients. All the remaining patients (n = 15) had POI. Five patients had OTT. All had a return of ovarian function. One patient gave birth to a healthy baby.

Conclusion: OTC is a safe fertility preservation technique and could be offered before MAC independent of the patient's age.

Citing Articles

Sickle cell disease and infertility risks: implications for counseling and care of affected girls and women.

Pecker L, Cameron K Expert Rev Hematol. 2024; 17(8):493-504.

PMID: 38913857 PMC: 11293988. DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2372320.

References
1.
Webber L, Davies M, Anderson R, Bartlett J, Braat D, Cartwright B . ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(5):926-37. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew027. View

2.
Rives N, Courbiere B, Almont T, Kassab D, Berger C, Grynberg M . What should be done in terms of fertility preservation for patients with cancer? The French 2021 guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2022; 173:146-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.013. View

3.
Imbert R, Moffa F, Tsepelidis S, Simon P, Delbaere A, Devreker F . Safety and usefulness of cryopreservation of ovarian tissue to preserve fertility: a 12-year retrospective analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(9):1931-40. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu158. View

4.
Armstrong A, Kimler B, Smith B, Woodruff T, Pavone M, Duncan F . Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young females through the Oncofertility Consortium's National Physicians Cooperative. Future Oncol. 2018; 14(4):363-378. PMC: 5827816. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0410. View

5.
Poirot C, Fortin A, Lacorte J, Akakpo J, Genestie C, Vernant J . Impact of cancer chemotherapy before ovarian cortex cryopreservation on ovarian tissue transplantation. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(6):1083-1094. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez047. View