» Articles » PMID: 38358425

Non-specific Irreversible Zr-mAb Uptake in Tumours: Evidence from Biopsy-proven Target-negative Tumours Using Zr-immuno-PET

Abstract

Background: Distribution of mAbs into tumour tissue may occur via different processes contributing differently to the Zr-mAb uptake on PET. Target-specific binding in tumours is of main interest; however, non-specific irreversible uptake may also be present, which influences quantification. The aim was to investigate the presence of non-specific irreversible uptake in tumour tissue using Patlak linearization on Zr-immuno-PET data of biopsy-proven target-negative tumours. Data of two studies, including target status obtained from biopsies, were retrospectively analysed, and Patlak linearization provided the net rate of irreversible uptake (K).

Results: Two tumours were classified as CD20-negative and two as CD20-positive. Four tumours were classified as CEA-negative and nine as CEA-positive. K values of CD20-negative (0.43 µL/g/h and 0.92 µL/g/h) and CEA-negative tumours (mdn = 1.97 µL/g/h, interquartile range (IQR) = 1.50-2.39) were higher than zero. Median K values of target-negative tumours were lower than CD20-positive (1.87 µL/g/h and 1.90 µL/g/h) and CEA-positive tumours (mdn = 2.77 µL/g/h, IQR = 2.11-3.65).

Conclusion: Biopsy-proven target-negative tumours showed irreversible uptake of Zr-mAbs measured in vivo using Zr-immuno-PET data, which suggests the presence of non-specific irreversible uptake in tumours. Consequently, for Zr-immuno-PET, even if the target is absent, a tumour-to-plasma ratio always increases over time.

Citing Articles

Measurement of specific and nonspecific tissue uptake of antibodies in tumor by SPECT imaging and nonlinear compartmental modeling.

Cho N, Ho J, Rosario G, Yu S, Ferl G, Boswell C EJNMMI Res. 2025; 15(1):15.

PMID: 39994098 PMC: 11850665. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01207-9.


Targeting of immune checkpoint regulator V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) with Zr-labelled CI-8993.

Burvenich I, Wichmann C, McDonald A, Guo N, Rigopoulos A, Huynh N Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):3863-3873.

PMID: 39060374 PMC: 11527895. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06854-z.

References
1.
van Brummelen E, Huisman M, de Wit-van der Veen L, Nayak T, Stokkel M, Mulder E . Zr-labeled CEA-targeted IL-2 variant immunocytokine in patients with solid tumors: CEA-mediated tumor accumulation and role of IL-2 receptor-binding. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(37):24737-24749. PMC: 5973872. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25343. View

2.
Lee S, Cavaliere A, Gallezot J, Keler T, Michelhaugh S, Belitzky E . [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 PET Correlates with Response to Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma B-targeted Therapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2022; 21(3):440-447. PMC: 8898259. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0590. View

3.
Iyer A, Khaled G, Fang J, Maeda H . Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discov Today. 2006; 11(17-18):812-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.005. View

4.
Marusyk A, Polyak K . Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1805(1):105-17. PMC: 2814927. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.11.002. View

5.
Wijngaarden J, Huisman M, Pouw J, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt C, Jauw Y, Boellaard R . Optimal imaging time points considering accuracy and precision of Patlak linearization for Zr-immuno-PET: a simulation study. EJNMMI Res. 2022; 12(1):54. PMC: 9445120. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00927-6. View