» Articles » PMID: 38357009

Time-delay Estimation in Biomechanical Stability: a Scoping Review

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Feb 15
PMID 38357009
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite its high-level of robustness and versatility, the human sensorimotor control system regularly encounters and manages various noises, non-linearities, uncertainties, redundancies, and delays. These delays, which are critical to biomechanical stability, occur in various parts of the system and include sensory, signal transmission, CNS processing, as well as muscle activation delays. Despite the relevance of accurate estimation and prediction of the various time delays, the current literature reflects major discrepancy with regards to existing prediction and estimation methods. This scoping review was conducted with the aim of characterizing and categorizing various approaches for estimation of physiological time delays based on PRISMA guidelines. Five data bases (EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, IEEE and Web of Science) were consulted between the years of 2000 and 2022, with a combination of four related categories of keywords. Scientific articles estimating at least one physiological time delay, experimentally or through simulations, were included. Eventually, 46 articles were identified and analyzed with 20 quantification and 16 qualification questions by two separate reviewers. Overall, the reviewed studies, experimental and analytical, employing both linear and non-linear models, reflected heterogeneity in the definition of time delay and demonstrated high variability in experimental protocols as well as the estimation of delay values. Most of the summarized articles were classified in the high-quality category, where multiple sound analytical approaches, including optimization, regression, Kalman filter and neural network in time domain or frequency domain were used. Importantly, more than 50% of the reviewed articles did not clearly define the nature of the estimated delays. This review presents and summarizes these issues and calls for a standardization of future scientific works for estimation of physiological time-delay.

References
1.
Vette A, Masani K, Kim J, Popovic M . Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation-assisted arm-free standing in individuals with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Neuromodulation. 2011; 12(1):22-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00184.x. View

2.
Cholewicki J, Silfies S, Shah R, Greene H, Reeves N, Alvi K . Delayed trunk muscle reflex responses increase the risk of low back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(23):2614-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000188273.27463.bc. View

3.
Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Panjabi M, Patel T . Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(8):947-54. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00009. View

4.
Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

5.
van Dieen J, Thissen C, van de Ven A, Toussaint H . The electro-mechanical delay of the erector spinae muscle: influence of rate of force development, fatigue and electrode location. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991; 63(3-4):216-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233851. View