» Articles » PMID: 38355587

Female Behavior Drives the Formation of Distinct Social Structures in C57BL/6J Versus Wild-derived Outbred Mice in Field Enclosures

Overview
Journal BMC Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38355587
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social behavior and social organization have major influences on individual health and fitness. Yet, biomedical research focuses on studying a few genotypes under impoverished social conditions. Understanding how lab conditions have modified social organizations of model organisms, such as lab mice, relative to natural populations is a missing link between socioecology and biomedical science.

Results: Using a common garden design, we describe the formation of social structure in the well-studied laboratory mouse strain, C57BL/6J, in replicated mixed-sex populations over 10-day trials compared to control trials with wild-derived outbred house mice in outdoor field enclosures. We focus on three key features of mouse social systems: (i) territory establishment in males, (ii) female social relationships, and (iii) the social networks formed by the populations. Male territorial behaviors were similar but muted in C57 compared to wild-derived mice. Female C57 sharply differed from wild-derived females, showing little social bias toward cage mates and exploring substantially more of the enclosures compared to all other groups. Female behavior consistently generated denser social networks in C57 than in wild-derived mice.

Conclusions: C57 and wild-derived mice individually vary in their social and spatial behaviors which scale to shape overall social organization. The repeatable societies formed under field conditions highlights opportunities to experimentally study the interplay between society and individual biology using model organisms.

Citing Articles

Rates of female mouse ultrasonic vocalizations are low and are not modulated by estrous state during interactions with muted males.

Malone C, Ziobro P, Khinno J, Tschida K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6841.

PMID: 40000725 PMC: 11862114. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91479-x.


Information sharing within a social network is key to behavioral flexibility-Lessons from mice tested under seminaturalistic conditions.

Winiarski M, Madecka A, Yadav A, Borowska J, Wolyniak M, Jedrzejewska-Szmek J Sci Adv. 2025; 11(1):eadm7255.

PMID: 39752499 PMC: 11698118. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adm7255.


Induction of territorial dominance and subordination behaviors in laboratory mice.

Battivelli D, Boldrini L, Jaiswal M, Patil P, Torchia S, Engelen E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28655.

PMID: 39562806 PMC: 11577026. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75545-4.


Validation of a non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice.

Xeni F, Marangoni C, Jackson M Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 49(12):1883-1891.

PMID: 38898205 PMC: 11479259. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01899-y.


Publisher Correction: Female behavior drives the formation of distinct social structures in C57BL/6J versus wild-derived outbred mice in field enclosures.

Vogt C, Zipple M, Sprockett D, Miller C, Hardy S, Arthur M BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):72.

PMID: 38561721 PMC: 10986037. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-01871-8.


References
1.
Farine D, Whitehead H . Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84(5):1144-63. PMC: 4973823. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12418. View

2.
Evans J, Lindholm A, Konig B . Long-term overlap of social and genetic structure in free-ranging house mice reveals dynamic seasonal and group size effects. Curr Zool. 2021; 67(1):59-69. PMC: 7901755. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoaa030. View

3.
Phifer-Rixey M, Nachman M . Insights into mammalian biology from the wild house mouse Mus musculus. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4397906. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05959. View

4.
Stamatoyannopoulos J, Snyder M, Hardison R, Ren B, Gingeras T, Gilbert D . An encyclopedia of mouse DNA elements (Mouse ENCODE). Genome Biol. 2012; 13(8):418. PMC: 3491367. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-418. View

5.
Morris J, Ruff J, Potts W, Carrier D . A disparity between locomotor economy and territory-holding ability in male house mice. J Exp Biol. 2017; 220(Pt 14):2521-2528. PMC: 5536892. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.154823. View