» Articles » PMID: 38352621

Examining Motor Evidence for the Pause-then-cancel Model of Action-stopping: Insights from Motor System Physiology

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38352621
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stopping initiated actions is fundamental to adaptive behavior. Longstanding, single-process accounts of action-stopping have been challenged by recent, two-process, 'pause-then-cancel' models. These models propose that action-stopping involves two inhibitory processes: 1) a fast Pause process, which broadly suppresses the motor system as the result of detecting any salient event, and 2) a slower Cancel process, which involves motor suppression specific to the cancelled action. A purported signature of the Pause process is global suppression, or the reduced corticospinal excitability (CSE) of task-unrelated effectors early on in action-stopping. However, unlike the Pause process, few (if any) motor system signatures of a Cancel process have been identified. Here, we used single- and paired-pulse TMS methods to comprehensively measure the local physiological excitation and inhibition of both responding and task-unrelated motor effector systems during action-stopping. Specifically, we measured CSE, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP). Consistent with key predictions from the pause-then-cancel model, CSE measurements at the responding effector indicated that additional suppression was necessary to counteract Go-related increases in CSE during-action-stopping, particularly at later timepoints. Increases in SICI on Stop-signal trials did not differ across responding and non-responding effectors, or across timepoints. This suggests SICI as a potential source of global suppression. Increases in CSP duration on Stop-signal trials were more prominent at later timepoints. SICI and CSP duration therefore appeared most consistent with the Pause and Cancel processes, respectively. Our study provides further evidence from motor system physiology that multiple inhibitory processes influence action-stopping.

References
1.
Badry R, Mima T, Aso T, Nakatsuka M, Abe M, Fathi D . Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(9):1717-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.027. View

2.
Paci M, Di Cosmo G, Perrucci M, Ferri F, Costantini M . Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15158. PMC: 8313697. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94494-w. View

3.
Wessel J, Diesburg D, Chalkley N, Greenlee J . A causal role for the human subthalamic nucleus in non-selective cortico-motor inhibition. Curr Biol. 2022; 32(17):3785-3791.e3. PMC: 9511894. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.067. View

4.
Werhahn K, Kunesch E, Noachtar S, Benecke R, Classen J . Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol. 1999; 517 ( Pt 2):591-7. PMC: 2269337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0591t.x. View

5.
Tatz J, Soh C, Wessel J . Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages. J Neurosci. 2021; 41(42):8826-8838. PMC: 8528501. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1105-21.2021. View